My Good Lord.
Someone needs to take a deep breath. And switch to decaf. Seriously.
Search found 3 matches
- Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:08 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Glock 27 opinions
- Replies: 26
- Views: 3446
- Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:33 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Glock 27 opinions
- Replies: 26
- Views: 3446
Re: Glock 27 opinions
Thanks for your quick reply, austinrealtor, but I fail to see why you disagree with me.austinrealtor wrote:No offense, skippr, but I couldn't disagree more with your assessment. See my previous post for why (I own both G27 & G23).
As for recoil, which I didn't address in my previous post, I do not find it unpleasant at all (with or without extensions) and about no par with G23 (maybe a bit snappier). But certainly not even close the the recoil of an airweight J-frame .38
Respectfully, of course.
You can't dispute the physical dimensions of the two pistols, can you?
Glocks are all inherently reliable, aren't they?
What's the problem?
And, yeah, I own a G22, G23, G27, and G35. I've used that last one in all the John Farnam and Gabe Suarez courses I've taken.
Please tell me why you "couldn't disagree more with [my] assessment."
- Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:45 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Glock 27 opinions
- Replies: 26
- Views: 3446
Re: Glock 27 opinions
I'm not a Glock fanatic, but the absolute truth is that they're solid, dependable, and reliable.
My typical carries are a 1911 or an XD(m)...however in a lockbox in my car is always a G27.
The G27 isn't a pleasant pistol to shoot. For those who are recoil-averse, it might be a handful even with a magazine extension.
IMHO, though, magazine extensions defeat the purpose of the pistol's size, so why bother?
If you're gonna put a magazine extension on a G27, then just buy a G23. Thickness, then height from sights-to-magazine, are the most important considerations in concealment. Length of the barrel comes in third-place for most people.
The G27 weighs a whispery 1.44 ounces less than the G23. Without magazine extensions, the G27 is only 0.86-inches taller that the G23. The G23 is 0.56-inches longer than the G27...but that tiny amount equates to an additional 0.35-inch sight radius. The G23 standard mag is 13 rounds; the G27 standard mag is 9 rounds. The width of the two pistols is identical.
I'm happy with my G27 for its purpose but, personally, were I looking to chose a daily carry, I'd look to the G23 over the G27.
My typical carries are a 1911 or an XD(m)...however in a lockbox in my car is always a G27.
The G27 isn't a pleasant pistol to shoot. For those who are recoil-averse, it might be a handful even with a magazine extension.
IMHO, though, magazine extensions defeat the purpose of the pistol's size, so why bother?
If you're gonna put a magazine extension on a G27, then just buy a G23. Thickness, then height from sights-to-magazine, are the most important considerations in concealment. Length of the barrel comes in third-place for most people.
The G27 weighs a whispery 1.44 ounces less than the G23. Without magazine extensions, the G27 is only 0.86-inches taller that the G23. The G23 is 0.56-inches longer than the G27...but that tiny amount equates to an additional 0.35-inch sight radius. The G23 standard mag is 13 rounds; the G27 standard mag is 9 rounds. The width of the two pistols is identical.
I'm happy with my G27 for its purpose but, personally, were I looking to chose a daily carry, I'd look to the G23 over the G27.