Search found 1 match

Return to “ATF proposed changes to 4473”

by bbhack
Sat Feb 08, 2020 9:47 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: ATF proposed changes to 4473
Replies: 14
Views: 6332

Re: ATF proposed changes to 4473

RoyGBiv wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:29 pm
LDP wrote: ↑Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:00 pm And I have to wonder about the reason for item #2.
If the question can be left unanswered by offering some "other" options then what is the true point of the question?
Whenever I see a box labeled "Sex" on any form, I try to fill in "I LIKE". *shrug*
The info on the 4473 needs to match exactly to the ID you provide the FFL. Some states are now issuing licenses with the "non binary" designation, so, if the 4473 only had male/female, those with non-binary designation on their state issued ID's would be unable to complete an FFL transaction legally.

This particular issue was caused by the states and ATF did what they need to do to remedy it. I may be not yet completely woke regarding non-binary things, but I don't want to do anything to discourage any law abiding person from owning the means for self-protection, so, kudos to ATF on this one.
An EO could remedy that. Not like there's nothing else going on, but it could be a blanket for all agencies and all forms.

Return to “ATF proposed changes to 4473”