TexasCHLforum.com

jason812 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:04 am Would this be related to the shooting in Greenville?

OneGun wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2019 9:22 am You need to consult an actual member of the state bar for this one. We can all arm-chair quarterback, but it will not mean much.

Txtension wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2019 10:31 am I have been stopped a few times, and in every one of those stops where I declined to answer incriminating questions, the officer has asked who my employer was.

I stopped answering that question too, when the director of my department pulled me into his office with HR to "get my side of the story." Said an officer called him directly. Nothing came of that incident, and Internal Affairs buried my complaint.

I was ready to sue for slander/libel (my dashcam footage proves the officer is a liar).

Rob72 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2019 9:39 am IANAL, however, having a reasonable amount of time in their company...

If the arrest was "inflagrante delecto", or "immediately in the act," and/or if the preponderance of available evidence is compelling, it would be a matter for redress on appeal, relating to biasing the jury pool, fair trial, etc,. Thousands of underemployed attorneys make such attempts every day.

If the arrest was of an individual with no significant history, no readily available substantive evidence, and/or if there is evidence of malfeasance on the part of the complainant or the Officers/Dept., then yes, that would be a classic civil rights case.

Redneck_Buddha wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 7:18 pm Cryptic.