Search found 2 matches

Return to “Insurance companies”

by bbhack
Thu Oct 11, 2018 1:07 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Insurance companies
Replies: 25
Views: 7203

Re: Insurance companies

Charles L. Cotton wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:07 am
USAA also opposed the Employer Parking Lot law. They tried to get an amendment that would have exempted USAA from it's provisions, but that failed.

Chas.
MPA and Parking Lot are closely related, but I think I had them tied together in my mind. I'll have to check what I said.
Edit: I was wrong about MPA. I was thinking about Employer Parking Lot law, as Charles pointed out. Thanks.
by bbhack
Thu Oct 11, 2018 12:48 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Insurance companies
Replies: 25
Views: 7203

Re: Insurance companies

srothstein wrote: ↑Wed Oct 10, 2018 11:33 pm
rotor wrote: ↑Wed Oct 10, 2018 5:21 pmI have been a member since 1972. I don't recall anything that implied an anti 2a stance.
I have only been a member for a few years, since they changed their membership policies to include all veterans and all ranks. They have a slight anti-2A stance based on their posting all of their property in San Antonio with the proper 30.06 signage as soon as the law passed allowing it.
There's also belief that they were against MPA. The state rep VanDerSomething was very against for no reason, except USAA was the 800 lb gorilla in her district.

Return to “Insurance companies”