Search found 1 match

by Will938
Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:49 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: So there I was, glossing over the SC decision
Replies: 7
Views: 2389

So there I was, glossing over the SC decision

and I came upon this part:
In Muscarello v. United States, 524 U. S.
125 (1998), in the course of analyzing the meaning of
“carries a firearm� in a federal criminal statute, JUSTICE
GINSBURG wrote that “[s]urely a most familiar meaning is,
as the Constitution’s Second Amendment . . . indicate[s]:
‘wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing
or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and
ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict
with another person.’ � Id., at 143 (dissenting opinion)
(quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 214 (6th ed. 1998)). We
think that JUSTICE GINSBURG accurately captured the
natural meaning of “bear arms.�
Does this mean that concealed carry in some form is now considered part of the second amendment?

Return to “So there I was, glossing over the SC decision”