Does this mean that concealed carry in some form is now considered part of the second amendment?In Muscarello v. United States, 524 U. S.
125 (1998), in the course of analyzing the meaning of
“carries a firearm� in a federal criminal statute, JUSTICE
GINSBURG wrote that “[s]urely a most familiar meaning is,
as the Constitution’s Second Amendment . . . indicate[s]:
‘wear, bear, or carry . . . upon the person or in the clothing
or in a pocket, for the purpose . . . of being armed and
ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict
with another person.’ � Id., at 143 (dissenting opinion)
(quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 214 (6th ed. 1998)). We
think that JUSTICE GINSBURG accurately captured the
natural meaning of “bear arms.�
Search found 1 match
Return to “So there I was, glossing over the SC decision”
- Thu Jun 26, 2008 10:49 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: So there I was, glossing over the SC decision
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2389
So there I was, glossing over the SC decision
and I came upon this part: