Search found 4 matches
- Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:58 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Baretta 92fs
- Replies: 23
- Views: 2076
- Sun Jul 30, 2006 9:44 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Baretta 92fs
- Replies: 23
- Views: 2076
- Sun Jul 30, 2006 8:38 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Baretta 92fs
- Replies: 23
- Views: 2076
Does anyone here actually think the 92FS is not a good gun?
The 92FS is a fine weapon and the design is battle tested. It's accurate, and IT WORKS. I've put thousands of rounds though mine and never had a single failure. Everything from Wolff to Czeck tracer rounds and even subgun ammo. Never a hiccup.
And, if comparing the cost savings of buying a P97, imo, that's not even worth discussing. The Beretta is miles and miles ahead of the Ruger in every way.
![Confused :???:](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
The 92FS is a fine weapon and the design is battle tested. It's accurate, and IT WORKS. I've put thousands of rounds though mine and never had a single failure. Everything from Wolff to Czeck tracer rounds and even subgun ammo. Never a hiccup.
And, if comparing the cost savings of buying a P97, imo, that's not even worth discussing. The Beretta is miles and miles ahead of the Ruger in every way.
- Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:32 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Baretta 92fs
- Replies: 23
- Views: 2076