Search found 4 matches

by Wes
Tue Nov 11, 2014 3:17 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: Critical legislation for 2015
Replies: 206
Views: 38409

Re: Critical legislation for 2015

CleverNickname wrote:I read an interesting idea on another board that I thought I'd bring over here: Require that anyone who posts a 30.06 sign register the sign with the state. Then the state can post a list on the web, like they do with establishments with alcohol licenses. That way people can know ahead of time whether an establishment they want to visit is posted. texas3006.com is nice, but it doesn't get every location.
I like that! :thumbs2:
by Wes
Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:25 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: Critical legislation for 2015
Replies: 206
Views: 38409

Re: Critical legislation for 2015

gsansing wrote:As much as I would love to see Open Carry, even if it's just for CHl'ers, I believe there would be a proliferation of 30.06 signage, thus rendering Open Carry ineffective. In my opinion only, and taking into account property rights of all, it is my believe I should be allowed to carry openly or concealed in any public setting or place. However, I don't believe this is an issue we can take on for this session.

So I think our next big issue is removing the off limits zones for CHl'ers and reducing the penalty for missing a 30.06 AT MOST a Class C misdemeanor or even better removing the 'teeth' altogether effectively making it a civil issue not a criminal.
Except open carry, per Charles, would not pass if it were tied to 30.06. I wouldn't want it to either. Why change 30.06 and give people a chance to water it down in the process. If our choice was open carried tied to 30.06 or no open carry, I'd choose no open carry.
by Wes
Wed Jun 25, 2014 1:38 am
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: Critical legislation for 2015
Replies: 206
Views: 38409

Re: Critical legislation for 2015

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Wes wrote:
jmra wrote:2, 3, and 5 in that order. Would also like to see the penalty in 30.06 lowered.

You mentioned before Charles that this would have to be accompanied with another bill, is that an option with any of the above?
If you mean the reduction of penalty for TPC §30.06, then no, it wouldn't be germane to any of the bills/issues listed. It's one of the things I mentioned that I would like to do, but it wouldn't have an impact on many people. That's why I didn't include it in the poll list.

Chas.
Understandable, wouldn't have been one of my top four either just curious. Thx
by Wes
Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:01 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: Critical legislation for 2015
Replies: 206
Views: 38409

Re: Critical legislation for 2015

jmra wrote:2, 3, and 5 in that order. Would also like to see the penalty in 30.06 lowered.

You mentioned before Charles that this would have to be accompanied with another bill, is that an option with any of the above?

Return to “Critical legislation for 2015”