Search found 2 matches

by stars200
Fri Apr 08, 2016 1:58 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
Replies: 229
Views: 88416

Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters

joe817 wrote:I'm surprised that Austin isn't claiming that their building is not an amusement park. :biggrinjester:
Nice -- Claim the elevators as a rides, would just need to expand the property to 75 acres. :smilelol5:
by stars200
Fri Apr 08, 2016 1:46 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: 30.06 Ruling Letters
Replies: 229
Views: 88416

Re: 30.06 Ruling Letters

http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/ ... -why.html/

Dallas County Courts ruling VS Austin ruling . Austin claiming a loophole.

Return to “30.06 Ruling Letters”