TexasCHLforum.com

JALLEN wrote:

APynckel wrote:LOL at the John Marshall quote as he is unconstitutionally using a power never delegated to him, to give him the power he is using. The states should have just 100% laughed that ruling 6 feet under.

Most ridiculous court ruling ever.

Really?

Perhaps it falls under the "fool most of the people all the time", or something.

In any event, it has never been successfully challenged, has been the law now for 200 years, and is likely to remain so. The Court's power to be the final arbitrator is firmly entrenched in our law and body politic, except of course by the Commies in this administration who wish to ignore it.

baldeagle wrote:Here's the description of the bill.

You will notice that the attorney general is required to file legal action to prevent implementation of federal statutes, regulations, rules or orders that violate the rights of Alaska residents.

I think these bills will make the federal government's job much, much harder. If the states are no longer going to act as their agents in enforcing unconstitutional laws, regulations, orders and rules, the feds are going to be ensnared in a snake pit of legal actions that will hinder them for years and cost them millions. Sooner or later they will be forced to either give up or show their true colors and send the military in to take over the state. If that happens, it's game on.

It's kind of the same thing as worker's going on strike and actively blocking the entrance to the plant. You might be able to stay in business, but it ain't gonna be business as usual and it's gonna cost you big time. And the harder the feds push the more people they will turn against them.

I wouldn't be surprised to see Alaska tell the feds to take a hike with the NICS system. We're simply not going to use it any more. Try and make us.

Beiruty wrote:

APynckel wrote:http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/20 ... nors-desk/

Alaska’s HB69, the 2nd Amendment Preservation Act, had it’s third reading in the senate last night, April 10th, and passed with a 17-3 vote. It returned to the house this morning, where they voted 34-5 to concur with the Senate version. The bill will be transmitted to Governor Parnell’s desk.

If Parnell signs it into law, it would nullify a large swath of unconstitutional federal power over the right to keep and bear arms. It begins with the premise that violations of the 2nd Amendment are not law at all

C'mon Texas! Let's follow suit!

Federal law would trump local law, All what states can do is not to enforce or corporate with Feds in their investigations.

Alaska’s HB69, the 2nd Amendment Preservation Act, had it’s third reading in the senate last night, April 10th, and passed with a 17-3 vote. It returned to the house this morning, where they voted 34-5 to concur with the Senate version. The bill will be transmitted to Governor Parnell’s desk.

If Parnell signs it into law, it would nullify a large swath of unconstitutional federal power over the right to keep and bear arms. It begins with the premise that violations of the 2nd Amendment are not law at all