Only if you vote for R.chasfm11 wrote:I didn't but that isn't going to change anything in the Fall. It is still going to be R or O.
Accepting the notion that you have no impact, is only letting the GoP establishment get what it wants.
Only if you vote for R.chasfm11 wrote:I didn't but that isn't going to change anything in the Fall. It is still going to be R or O.
That's fine, but you (in Tx) still have a vote for the primary nomination. If you don't like Romney, DON'T VOTE FOR HIM!chasfm11 wrote:I didn't get to set up the choice. But between Romney and Obama.... Hmmm... let me see..... NO CONTEST! If nothing else, remember the last two Supreme Court appointments, what they were and who made them. Believe me, there is another Kagan or Sotomayor out there and it is only going to take one more and bye, bye 2nd Amendment.APynckel wrote:.Carl wrote:For me, it's Cruz all the way. Dewhurst has had plenty of chances to prove his conservative mettle over the years and failed miserably. Most recently, border security, sanctity cities, proposed wage tax and TSA.
Cruz is consistent in his beliefs and actions. He is a fighter and I believe he will not backdown when the going gets tough.
Cruz got my vote. Anyone that Rand Paul will support, I will support (as sheepish as that is).
I voted for Paul in the primary, because he believes in and won't trounce the constitution, like Romney has in Massachusetts. I'm surprised ANYONE on this forum would support that anti-gun fanatic.
If for no other reason than sweeping house, I'd like to see Cruz get it over Dewhurst.
.Carl wrote:For me, it's Cruz all the way. Dewhurst has had plenty of chances to prove his conservative mettle over the years and failed miserably. Most recently, border security, sanctity cities, proposed wage tax and TSA.
Cruz is consistent in his beliefs and actions. He is a fighter and I believe he will not backdown when the going gets tough.