Search found 1 match

by Ruark
Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:41 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: This is an interesting take on GFZ
Replies: 11
Views: 2508

Re: This is an interesting take on GFZ

I don't see how any such case could be constructed. So prior to CHLs being allowed, businesses were responsible for providing armed security, and could be sued if they didn't and a customer was hurt in a robbery? I don't recall any such cases.

There's a fourth item on that list: the fact that nobody forces the customer to enter a business with an 06 sign. He knows the risk before he CHOOSES to enter or not enter. It's like seeing a big sign saying "CAUTION: WET FLOOR!" then you walk past it and slip and fall.

Return to “This is an interesting take on GFZ”