I find your post to be rather disturbing. I may be reading it incorrectly, but when later challenged, wouldn't the officer be required to explain the safety reason for disarming? I see nothing in the law that says, "because an officer said so...."texanjoker wrote:jimlongley wrote:Which law is that?texanjoker wrote:That would put you in a difficult position as we do not have to call a supervisor and the law requires a CHL holder to surrender your weapon when instructed to do so on a traffic stop.
If you would read this thread you would have seen it posted several times.
GC §411.207. AUTHORITY OF PEACE OFFICER TO DISARM.
(a) A peace officer who is acting in the lawful discharge of the officer's
official duties may disarm a license holder at any time the officer
reasonably believes it is necessary for the protection of the license holder,
officer, or another individual.
GC §411.207. AUTHORITY OF PEACE OFFICER TO DISARM.
(a) A peace officer who is acting in the lawful discharge of the officer's
official duties may disarm a license holder at any time the officer
reasonably believes it is necessary for the protection of the license holder,
officer, or another individual.[/quote]