TexasCHLforum.com

Panda wrote:

2firfun50 wrote:[

Good one!!!! Point taken, however I do want the law to change. Maybe an innocent fisherman won't get shot. Only takes a few bad apples you know.....

The only instructor certification that guy had was from the NRA. SB481 wouldn't make this NRA instructor any less of a bozo.

No, but it will stop him and maybe some other individuals from "selling" out-of-state CHLs. Remember, Florida accepts almost anything as proof of proficency.

Don't get me wrong. I have no problem with a Texas resident having multiple CHLs to pick up extra states. But I do have a big problem with Texas residents that hold out-of-state CHLs who don't meet the Texas requirements, especially the DWI

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

2firfun50 wrote:If you don't want to follow Texas CHL law, move to where the law suits you.

People are following Texas law. We simply don't want the law to change. So you can move to a state that requires its residents to have that state's license.

Chas.

Turnabout being fair play, and all that......

Good one!!!! Point taken, however I do want the law to change. Maybe an innocent fisherman won't get shot. Only takes a few bad apples you know...............

http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=65456" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

We'll just have to agree to disagree on this issue. When one is a resident of the great state of Texas, one should follow Texas law and have a Texas CHL.

When a Texas resident gets a Florida CHL (CCW), the CHL license is not in danger if you:

1. Get one DWI (the first one is free under Floriday law.
2. Don't pay your property taxes,
3. Don't pay your child support.
4. Get arrested for Disorderly Conduct.

I'm just not buying the "shall not be infringed" argument, nor the "cost to much", nor the Senator/Representative NRA rating. For me its all about Texas residents being treated equally under Texas CHL law.

If you don't want to follow Texas CHL law, move to where the law suits you.