Search found 2 matches
Return to “30.06 notification question”
- Fri Sep 26, 2014 12:10 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: 30.06 notification question
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1869
Re: 30.06 notification question
that was my initial impression as well. Not that I am a big Starbucks fan but I believe Chili's is in the same boat as Starbucks.
- Fri Sep 26, 2014 11:52 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: 30.06 notification question
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1869
30.06 notification question
I am sure everyone is aware of the pressure Mothers against Guns are putting on business such as Target, Chili's and Kroger and we have all heard the medias reports of how Starbucks has Asked its customers to kindly leave their guns at home. I know that the penal code is specific on the language of the sign that is needed under section 30.06, but am I to assume that Starbucks request would be considered proper notification as described below? I am not a lawyer and didn't spend the night at a Holiday Inn so thought someone here might know.
(b) For purposes of this section, a person receives notice if the owner of the property or someone with apparent authority to act for the owner provides notice to the person by oral or written communication.
(b) For purposes of this section, a person receives notice if the owner of the property or someone with apparent authority to act for the owner provides notice to the person by oral or written communication.