TACOM issued the contract specifically to supply Iraqi military/security forces. The requirement was for 10,000 pistols. They awarded Ruger a contract for 5,000. Sig received a contract to supply the other 5,000.Gordie Howe wrote:So the Iraqis get the cast-offs ?
donkey wrote:That story is from 2004 and those pistols were for the Iraqi military/security forces.Gordie Howe wrote:I read the US ARMY TANK Command receently ordered 9mm Ruger P95 s'. http://www.ruger.com/news/2004-12-23.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Army likely to "Dump" 9MM for 40s&w or 45's?”
- Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:40 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Army likely to "Dump" 9MM for 40s&w or 45's?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 6230
Re: Army likely to "Dump" 9MM for 40s&w or 45's?
- Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:38 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Army likely to "Dump" 9MM for 40s&w or 45's?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 6230
Re: Army likely to "Dump" 9MM for 40s&w or 45's?
That story is from 2004 and those pistols were for the Iraqi military/security forces.Gordie Howe wrote:I read the US ARMY TANK Command receently ordered 9mm Ruger P95 s'. http://www.ruger.com/news/2004-12-23.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:17 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Army likely to "Dump" 9MM for 40s&w or 45's?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 6230
Re: Army likely to "Dump" 9MM for 40s&w or 45's?
Keep in mind that money is going to be a huge factor in selecting a new pistol and/or a new caliber. One of the main reasons the military selected the Beretta 92 over the Sig P226 was due to cost. 9mm ammo is also less expensive than .45 ammo.