TexasCHLforum.com

RHenriksen wrote:

C-dub wrote:

donkey wrote: There is no blue 51% sign.

Do you mean at all or just in the establishment you were in?

If only the 51% and Unlicensed Possession signs are posted I'm having trouble understanding what is incorrect about them both being posted.

The selection of which sign to post is an either/or condition.

C-dub wrote:

donkey wrote:

C-dub wrote:Yeah, I think I'm just confused now. The red 51% sign applies to CHL holders and unlicenced sign applies to everyone else, right? I don't see the problem with having both of these signs posted, but have the feeling I'm going to be really when someone points it out to me.

The problem is that the law does not prohibit CHL holders from carrying in locations that are required to post the blue sign. This location should only post the blue sign. Businesses do not get to choose which sign(blue/red) they post. The type of liquor license they have determines which sign they are required to display. The location sells alcohol but receives most of its revenue from other products and/or services. It should display only the blue sign and CHL holders are permitted to carry in locations that post blue signs. If the restaurant wants to prohibit CHL holders from carrying, then they need to post a 30.06 sign.

Now I think you are confusing the blue 51% sign up with the blue letter "unlicensed possession" sign as seen in Scott in Houston's picture. However, yes, posting both red and blue 51% signs would be a conflict.

C-dub wrote:Yeah, I think I'm just confused now. The red 51% sign applies to CHL holders and unlicenced sign applies to everyone else, right? I don't see the problem with having both of these signs posted, but have the feeling I'm going to be really when someone points it out to me.