Of corse, if a vet isn't competent to posses a gun, they certainly couldn't be competent enough to obey the Brady Law, could they?Topbuilder wrote:"What if that letter also stated: “A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub.L.No. 103-159, as implemented at 18, United States Code 924(a)(2).”?"
Search found 1 match
Return to “No guns for Vets??”
- Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:21 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: No guns for Vets??
- Replies: 5
- Views: 632