TexasCHLforum.com

treadlightly wrote:I think I need a lesson in Texas civics, too.

The only thing I know about Dan Huffines is he introduced a Constitutional carry measure. Because of work disasters, I couldn't get to my computer to listen until late, and happened to hear the last few minutes of what Huffines had to say this afternoon. Things like "trust citizens," information about the lack of problems with open carry in other states, and the civil right guaranteed in the Second Amendment.

However, from what I see in this thread Huffines is a serious peckerwood who needs a sharp rap with a clue stick. The limited sample I heard would have gotten Charlton Heston a standing "O" if he'd said the same things, but Huffines appears to have a reputation problem.

But sometimes it's OK to (figuratively) shoot the messenger. If Hitler can make the trains run on time, I'm quite happy to run late. Vermont is probably scenic and I hear their gun laws are a model, but I wouldn't want to set foot in a state that elects socialists to Congress no matter how I agree with their gun freedoms.

So while you have that clue stick out, please, sir, I'd like another because I'm at a loss. What has Huffines done to cost him the support of gon owners?

Perhaps those nice folks at Google can illuminate my understanding. I shall hie me to my browser.

Charles L. Cotton wrote:The vote to reduce the Senate's 2/3 (21 votes) to 3/5 (19 votes) is glaringly important now. SB17 would never have been brought up for vote if we still has the 2/3 rule.

Chas.

jimlongley wrote:I live within 1000 feet of more than one public park.

AJSully421 wrote:Seems to me that the Secretary is running through the votes faster and faster each time since she, and everyone else, already knows what the score is going to be... 20-11.

Charles L. Cotton wrote:Sen. Rodriguez, "another common sense amendment" - Democrat code for "anti-gun."

Chas.