Search found 2 matches

by jimlongley
Wed Dec 24, 2014 9:48 am
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: HB 554
Replies: 7
Views: 1252

Re: HB 554

On rereading, I realize that once again I have misinterpreted what I consider to be clumsy legalese.

I read "exited the screening checkpoint for the secured area immediately upon notification that the actor possessed the handgun."

I read that to mean that the actor had exited the screening checkpoint INTO the secured area, where what is meant appears to be that the actor has left the screening checkpoint that is for the secured area.

Doesn't pay to read these things when I haven't had enough espresso and am almost late for work.

Now my next question is whether this will override federal law.
by jimlongley
Tue Dec 23, 2014 3:35 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: HB 554
Replies: 7
Views: 1252

Re: HB 554

It is strange because they have the CHL holder exiting to the "secured" area, which would mean they passed the checkpoint and now were in the secured area armed. I think it should be "unsecured."

Return to “HB 554”