Unfortunately that is a recent change in philosophy and it should be changed back. If you are an enemy, foreign or domestic, upon conviction you lose multitudes of rights: Free Speech; Bear Arms; etc; the whole list, back the way it was and should be.Beiruty wrote:jimlongley wrote:But first, according to our Bill of Rights, we have to prove that he set the bomb off, and then he loses the rights.jocat54 wrote:texanjoker wrote:It is a tough call, but he is a US citizen. At what point do we say you do or do not receive the Bill of Rights? They made the decision for criminal court so that is out.
Not tough for me....he lost ALL rights when he set that bomb off.
Not accurate what joecat wants.
Those convicts serving life sentences in prison for whatever heinous crime they committed are deprived from the physical liberty of their mobility, but never lost their human rights.
But I stand by my statement. He does not lose ANY rights at the act, only at the conviction for the act.
Just the same way. Timothy McVeigh proved he didn't want to be a citizen, so grant him his wish, after conviction, and Hassan is worse, HE should be declared an enemy combatant, a saboteur, and an enemy agent and stood against a wall and shot, upon conviction.Purplehood wrote:So how would you handle someone born and raised in the USA?jocat54 wrote:texanjoker wrote:It is a tough call, but he is a US citizen. At what point do we say you do or do not receive the Bill of Rights? They made the decision for criminal court so that is out.
Not tough for me....he lost ALL rights when he set that bomb off.