I can't imagine what you think I am saying. It is my honest intent to never wound anyone in my house. Of course if they don't belong in my house, then I might have to change my intentions, but it remains my honest intent nonetheless.67SS wrote:jimlongley wrote:I can honestly say that it is my intent to never wound anyone in my house.philip964 wrote:When you shoot a robber inside your house, you create a situation where either: the robber dies, so the state has the expense of burying the "victim", lots of paperwork for them, including investigations, grand juries; but mainly a human being is denied the opportunity to be rehabilitated and support the state. Or you wound the "victim" and the state through the new universal health insurance program will have to spend millions on lifesaving medical treatment and then physical therapy so that he can again regain his use of limbs etc, so that he can be rehabilitated and then support the state.
In either case by the use of a fire arm you have cost the state a tremendous amount of money. Obviously this is something they wish to limit, and so will attempt to make illegal, by banning firearms and making it illegal to injure a robber. This is the case now in England, welcome to your future under universal health care.
EASY what you say.... all forms of electronic communication is admissible..... :![]()
you know.. thought police....
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Robbery Victims Shooting Attackers Called ‘Alarming Trend’”
- Thu Feb 14, 2013 12:35 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Robbery Victims Shooting Attackers Called ‘Alarming Trend’
- Replies: 30
- Views: 5843
Re: Robbery Victims Shooting Attackers Called ‘Alarming Tren
- Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:09 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Robbery Victims Shooting Attackers Called ‘Alarming Trend’
- Replies: 30
- Views: 5843
Re: Robbery Victims Shooting Attackers Called ‘Alarming Tren
I can honestly say that it is my intent to never wound anyone in my house.philip964 wrote:When you shoot a robber inside your house, you create a situation where either: the robber dies, so the state has the expense of burying the "victim", lots of paperwork for them, including investigations, grand juries; but mainly a human being is denied the opportunity to be rehabilitated and support the state. Or you wound the "victim" and the state through the new universal health insurance program will have to spend millions on lifesaving medical treatment and then physical therapy so that he can again regain his use of limbs etc, so that he can be rehabilitated and then support the state.
In either case by the use of a fire arm you have cost the state a tremendous amount of money. Obviously this is something they wish to limit, and so will attempt to make illegal, by banning firearms and making it illegal to injure a robber. This is the case now in England, welcome to your future under universal health care.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/462e9/462e9870b36ef095753d348a19c9210e883bb164" alt="evil :evil2:"
- Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:58 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Robbery Victims Shooting Attackers Called ‘Alarming Trend’
- Replies: 30
- Views: 5843
Re: Robbery Victims Shooting Attackers Called ‘Alarming Tren
It's an alarming trend to the anti-gun nuts because it shows that legally armed law abiding citizens can actually defend themselves with their legally carried guns. Kind of puts the lie to what bambam and his minions are saying.