Never said or even implied, just I expect votes against someone who refuses to give straight and honest answers. I have written and emailed my senators, have you?Purplehood wrote:Wow. And you have never seen that happen before in a Senate hearing on either side of the aisle?jimlongley wrote:All I see in that exchange is someone refusing to answer the question as asked, and again I have to wonder if she would allow such a thing to happen in her court.
I thiink we not only ave reason to be worried, I think we should all be writing to our Senators to object to her confirmation, based strictly on her refusal to answer direct questions openly and honestly, as I have done.
Search found 5 matches
Return to “UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor”
- Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:04 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor
- Replies: 80
- Views: 8451
Re: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor
- Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:39 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor
- Replies: 80
- Views: 8451
Re: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor
All I see in that exchange is someone refusing to answer the question as asked, and again I have to wonder if she would allow such a thing to happen in her court.
I thiink we not only ave reason to be worried, I think we should all be writing to our Senators to object to her confirmation, based strictly on her refusal to answer direct questions openly and honestly, as I have done.
I thiink we not only ave reason to be worried, I think we should all be writing to our Senators to object to her confirmation, based strictly on her refusal to answer direct questions openly and honestly, as I have done.
- Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:33 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor
- Replies: 80
- Views: 8451
Re: Coburn vs. Sotomayor
Even "sharp as a tack" does not necessarily imply intelligence. She's quick on her feet, to be sure, she came up with some awfully inventive ways to avoid answering direct questions, and I doubt that she would accept such answers in her court, but intelligence would still imply the awareness that anyone with the , for that matter, does anyone even remember what a tack is?stevie_d_64 wrote:Well, I am going to go against the grain here and say she is sharp as a tack on these issues...She is exactly what Obama wanted...jimlongley wrote:An intelligent person would not have answered a question about the right to self defense by citing NY State laws, knowing, that first, the citation would be limited in scope, not applicable in a SCOTUS setting, and second that everyone with any intelligence would see right through her avoidance.
She is drawing ire from us and many other single issue people, and any attacks on her can immediately be labled as racist...Perfect liberal political play...And the state controlled media will lap that up like grape kool-aid in Gayana...
This goes to my basic premise...If you do not understand, or in this case, fully understand how to destroy a inalienable, moral right as this is, I have no use for you in any capacity as a politician (elected official) apointed or elected, or even a citizen...
Yep, that pretty harsh, but then again...Its just me...
- Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:09 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor
- Replies: 80
- Views: 8451
Re: Coburn vs. Sotomayor
An intelligent person would not have answered a question about the right to self defense by citing NY State laws, knowing, that first, the citation would be limited in scope, not applicable in a SCOTUS setting, and second that everyone with any intelligence would see right through her avoidance.
- Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:38 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: UPDATE: Coburn vs. Sotomayor
- Replies: 80
- Views: 8451
Re: Coburn vs. Sotomayor
Neithere of which is a valid indicator of intelligence.Purplehood wrote:find her educated and articulate.
Which also does not indicate intelligence, and may actually serve to indicate a decided lack.Purplehood wrote:She is also exceedingly skilled at avoiding giving an answer to a direct question.