TexasCHLforum.com

DynamicDan wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 2:38 pm She didn't she was talking about his Tshirt. It evolved into an actual gun, like so many stories that get passed around.

Oh, so a lot of people aren't telling the truth about what she said?

DynamicDan wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 2:25 pm

mojo84 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 1:23 pm

KC5AV wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 11:47 am

lonestar144 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:26 pm

mojo84 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:16 pm Why are they implying flying commercially proves he didn't have a gun with him?

Bonnen's wife said that McNutt threatened and/or brandished a weapon when he was at the residence. Flight records note that he did not check a firearm, therefore was not carrying.

I keep seeing this, but I only remember her saying that he showed up wearing a ‘t shirt with a machine gun on it’, or some such nonsense. Can someone find a news report where she is quoted as saying he brandished a weapon or showed up armed?

My recollection is similar.

It was a Tshirt that he was wearing. Man that is really intimidating, almost as good as kids drawing pictures of guns and being punished.

That does not answer the question. Why are people saying his wife said he had a gun with him? Not saying she didn't but just curious where that's came from.

KC5AV wrote: ↑Tue Apr 30, 2019 11:47 am

lonestar144 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:26 pm

mojo84 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:16 pm Why are they implying flying commercially proves he didn't have a gun with him?

Bonnen's wife said that McNutt threatened and/or brandished a weapon when he was at the residence. Flight records note that he did not check a firearm, therefore was not carrying.

I keep seeing this, but I only remember her saying that he showed up wearing a ‘t shirt with a machine gun on it’, or some such nonsense. Can someone find a news report where she is quoted as saying he brandished a weapon or showed up armed?

My recollection is similar.

bblhd672 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:01 am It appears to me that Mr. Bonnen is fully aware of the likelihood of Texas turning from purple to blue soon, and is strengthening his alliances with the left to make his moving to the Democrat party easier. His public statements parrotting Everytown/Mom talking points, appointing anti-gun Democrats to powerful committee chairs, obfuscating about political moves, etc is evidence he is concerned about his long term position of POWER.

This is very plausible and a perspective I had not thought of until I saw your comment. Now days, it is more about gaining power and remaining in power than doing what is right based upon principle. It seems the days of representing and serving one's constituency are fast become a thing of the past. Sad times indeed.

lonestar144 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:26 pm

mojo84 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:16 pm Why are they implying flying commercially proves he didn't have a gun with him?

Bonnen's wife said that McNutt threatened and/or brandished a weapon when he was at the residence. Flight records note that he did not check a firearm, therefore was not carrying.

Fair enough.

Why are they implying flying commercially proves he didn't have a gun with him?

Why did the DPS Troopers offer to do the work of a political activist while they were on duty?

SewTexas wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2019 4:47 pm here's the biggest problem I have with any of this....
If any of us...OK, if any of YOU, because I'm a small grey haired woman, had done what Mr Bonnen did at the party last week to Mr McNutt, you would have ended up as a guest not of the Republican Party but of the City of Austin at the Jail....with charges of Assault. Because of who he is, well, that doesn't make me happy.

I think that is a very fair and accurate observation. Mcnutt should file charges against him if he was indeed assaulted.

1911 Raptor wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2019 12:23 pm

flechero wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2019 11:47 am

mojo84 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2019 10:33 am

bblhd672 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2019 10:16 am So Bonnen lied/exaggerated/mischaracterized/politicized whatever you want to call it. Most politicians do that without a second thought.

What Bonnen didn't lie about was McNutt going to his and other legislators homes while they were in Austin for the legislative session. And that is the crux of what McNutt did to reflect badly upon himself and law abiding gun owners in Texas who want less restrictions on their 2nd Amendment rights. That he did it in the nicest, gentlest manner possible doesn't mean he was right in doing it.

No elected official is going to go after the Speaker in an effort to oust him during the legislative session over this.

What he did and how he did it are examples of passive aggressive behavior. He drove across the state to show up at their homes and neighborhoods while the legislators weren't home to let them know he and his followers know where they live.

What he did is a passive aggressive method of doxing and intimidation.

I'm surprised by these comments. So we should accept bonnen's slanderous behavior/character attack as fine/normal, but someone acting as a gentleman having a conversation with a State Trooper is problematic?

I also missed the doxing and intimidation part? The trooper put the flier on the door, after a pleasant and light conversation. The fact the TXGR's own person delivered it is no more "intimidating" than hiring a person to go door to door.

Is this different than a politician sending political canvassers to my home asking for a vote. They have my address and know my name. Door hangers/fliers are now aggressive? I guess I should feel really threatened by about 50 different politicians.

I agree with you. We as free citizens of a free state have as much right to get our message out as the politicians. McNutt wasn’t confrontational and was handing out fliers. The DPS certainly didn’t see a problem with it.

Troopers didn't see a problem with it? Then why did they intercept him and take the flyer from him to put it on Bonnen's door rather than just telling McNutt to go ahead and put it on there?

flechero wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2019 11:47 am

mojo84 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2019 10:33 am

bblhd672 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2019 10:16 am So Bonnen lied/exaggerated/mischaracterized/politicized whatever you want to call it. Most politicians do that without a second thought.

What Bonnen didn't lie about was McNutt going to his and other legislators homes while they were in Austin for the legislative session. And that is the crux of what McNutt did to reflect badly upon himself and law abiding gun owners in Texas who want less restrictions on their 2nd Amendment rights. That he did it in the nicest, gentlest manner possible doesn't mean he was right in doing it.

No elected official is going to go after the Speaker in an effort to oust him during the legislative session over this.

What he did and how he did it are examples of passive aggressive behavior. He drove across the state to show up at their homes and neighborhoods while the legislators weren't home to let them know he and his followers know where they live.

What he did is a passive aggressive method of doxing and intimidation.

I'm surprised by these comments. So we should accept bonnen's slanderous behavior/character attack as fine/normal, but someone acting as a gentleman having a conversation with a State Trooper is problematic?

I also missed the doxing and intimidation part? The trooper put the flier on the door, after a pleasant and light conversation. The fact the TXGR's own person delivered it is no more "intimidating" than hiring a person to go door to door.

Is this different than a politician sending political canvassers to my home asking for a vote. They have my address and know my name. Door hangers/fliers are now aggressive? I guess I should feel really threatened by about 50 different politicians.

Where have I indicated anything close to accepting Bonnen's slanderous behavior? Just because I disagree with McNutt driving across the state to show up at legislators' homes and publicizing it on the internet through his facebook group to thousands of his followers (doxing) doesn't mean I accept Bonnen's behavior. I have been against Bonnen before he was elected speaker and was blasted for it on here and scolded like a child. I think if you actually read my comments, some of which were part of a thread that has been locked or deleted, you would realize I take issue with how both men have handled themselves and the situation.

As McNutt said, he has thousands of followers in his facebook group and he has admitted to sharing the home information about 3 legislators through that group in order to put pressure on the legislators. The only reason he had a conversation with the trooper is because they intercepted him because McNutt has publicized his visit to two other legislators' homes and planned to visit Bonnen's. If he hadn't publicized his activities, the Troopers would not have been there in the first place.

Showing up at a political adversaries home when you know he is not home, which is private property, and publicizing it through the internet is not the same as sending something via mail or having random volunteer canvassers deliver something to be hung on a door. Just because you believe in the cause, doesn't mean the means is justified. Again, I am no fan of Bonnen and am in no way defending him, his actions, his comments or his conduct. I just do not agree with showing up at a political adversaries home, especially, when it is known he is not there.

Think of it this way. Let's say you and I have a serious disagreement over an issue and I am really upset that you disagree with me and then I happen to show up at your house to deliver a written explanation of my position. Oh, and I also deliver it to your neighbors hoping they would put pressure on you to agree with me. Then you find out I publicized it to 250,000+, or however many followers McNutt claims, would that change your opinion about me just canvassing your neighborhood?

Bottom line, Bonnen is a lying turncoat that played the system, got the power he wanted and then screwed many that supported him. McNutt crossed a line that he shouldn't have.

Jason Todd wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2019 11:40 am

mojo84 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2019 7:40 pm Where are these Bonnen fanboys to whom you refer?

Why roll your eyes at my question? It's a legitimate question. He mentioned Bonnen fanboys and I haven't seen any except those dems that benefit from him and his decisions.

bblhd672 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 22, 2019 10:16 am So Bonnen lied/exaggerated/mischaracterized/politicized whatever you want to call it. Most politicians do that without a second thought.

What Bonnen didn't lie about was McNutt going to his and other legislators homes while they were in Austin for the legislative session. And that is the crux of what McNutt did to reflect badly upon himself and law abiding gun owners in Texas who want less restrictions on their 2nd Amendment rights. That he did it in the nicest, gentlest manner possible doesn't mean he was right in doing it.

No elected official is going to go after the Speaker in an effort to oust him during the legislative session over this.

What he did and how he did it are examples of passive aggressive behavior. He drove across the state to show up at their homes and neighborhoods while the legislators weren't home to let them know he and his followers know where they live.

What he did is a passive aggressive method of doxing and intimidation.

apostate wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2019 6:45 pm I hope the Bonnen fanboys watch the DPS body cam video and finally admit the real reason unlicensed carry was killed this year was because of Bonnen. Period.

Bonnen made his committee chairman appointments at the beginning of the session, and unlicensed carry was doomed from the start, just like Charles said months ago.

https://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=145&t=94723

I think most people acknowledge Bonnen killed unlicensed open carry and many other pro gun and a lot of other legislation long before this encounter or the video being published.

Where are these Bonnen fanboys to whom you refer?


Edited to correct my spellchecker's correction of "killed" to "liked". Only thing worse than a spellchecker is a progressive politically correct spellchecker.