Since that part is not in quotes, I suspect it is the ignorance of the reporter that drove that comment. I bet the reporter put 2 and 2 together and got 5.Abraham wrote:"Springfield Police have determined the shooting to be justified self-defense, saying the resident holds a valid license to carry a firearm."
Given one doesn't have to have a CHL to defend oneself in the home, why on earth would the police feel it alright to "out" the home owner regarding his possessing a CHL?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Homeowner defends them self and child”
- Mon Feb 09, 2015 11:35 am
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: Homeowner defends them self and child
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1352
Re: Homeowner defends them self and child
- Mon Feb 09, 2015 10:30 am
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: Homeowner defends them self and child
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1352
Homeowner defends them self and child
http://www.wggb.com/2015/02/07/springfi ... er-street/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
We all know this but it is a reminder that shooting someone isn't necessarily going to be fatal.
We all know this but it is a reminder that shooting someone isn't necessarily going to be fatal.
...the homeowner who, feeling threatened, shot Jordan in the chest and arm. The Eady brothers then fled the scene and were stopped by officers.
The injured brother was taken to Baystate Medical Center, where he was treated and released into police custody. Both brothers have been charged with Armed Burglary, Threat to Murder, and Defacement of Real Property.