TexasCHLforum.com

VoiceofReason wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

OldCurlyWolf wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

JP171 wrote:

mojo84 wrote:Crazy isn't it. Next we'll hear smoking causes cancer.

Smoking doesn't cause cancer, its all the chemicals they add to make it more addictive that cause cancer, just look at several countries that don't allow all those additives, way low cancer rate. I do admit that smoking causes other things, kinda like bullets cause lead poisoning stoopidity causes lead poisoning not bullets

Smoking is how those chemicals get in your body. Therefore, smoking causes cancer. This is not something that is arguable.

Mojo,
No matter how illogical your statements may be????

The direct cause is the substances. The other is just a method of delivery. The same chemicals will have the same result with a different delivery method. Ergo, per your logic the other delivery method also causes cancer. NOPE. Just doesn't pass the smell test.

Illogical? Show me a credible study that says smoking does not cause cancer. So does dipping snuff and chewing tobacco. If you argue the points you are only arguing for arguments sake.

Smoking is one thing that causes cancer. So does a few dozen other things. Doctors and Coroners are quick to label a case of cancer as being caused by smoking no matter how long or how long ago. Is it even possible to tell if a case of cancer is caused by smoking twenty years ago, or the 14th X-ray you had?

OldCurlyWolf wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

JP171 wrote:

mojo84 wrote:Crazy isn't it. Next we'll hear smoking causes cancer.

Smoking doesn't cause cancer, its all the chemicals they add to make it more addictive that cause cancer, just look at several countries that don't allow all those additives, way low cancer rate. I do admit that smoking causes other things, kinda like bullets cause lead poisoning stoopidity causes lead poisoning not bullets

Smoking is how those chemicals get in your body. Therefore, smoking causes cancer. This is not something that is arguable.

Mojo,
No matter how illogical your statements may be????

The direct cause is the substances. The other is just a method of delivery. The same chemicals will have the same result with a different delivery method. Ergo, per your logic the other delivery method also causes cancer. NOPE. Just doesn't pass the smell test.

JP171 wrote:

mojo84 wrote:Crazy isn't it. Next we'll hear smoking causes cancer.

Smoking doesn't cause cancer, its all the chemicals they add to make it more addictive that cause cancer, just look at several countries that don't allow all those additives, way low cancer rate. I do admit that smoking causes other things, kinda like bullets cause lead poisoning stoopidity causes lead poisoning not bullets