Why do reporters require protection? From whom?
Why shouldn't reporters be required to appear and testify like anyone else? Why should their speech be more precious than anyone else's?
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Feinstein: 1st Amendment Is A Special Privilege, Not A Right”
- Fri Sep 20, 2013 11:21 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Feinstein: 1st Amendment Is A Special Privilege, Not A Right
- Replies: 86
- Views: 9270
- Thu Sep 19, 2013 2:51 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Feinstein: 1st Amendment Is A Special Privilege, Not A Right
- Replies: 86
- Views: 9270
Re: Feinstein: 1st Amendment Is A Special Privilege, Not A R
ATDM wrote: The Founders specified that "Congress shall make no law...." Too bad they didn't stop right there.
Don't blame ATDM for that one!
- Thu Sep 19, 2013 2:40 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Feinstein: 1st Amendment Is A Special Privilege, Not A Right
- Replies: 86
- Views: 9270
Re: Feinstein: 1st Amendment Is A Special Privilege, Not A R
What is a real reporter?
Do they have any licensing, educational requirements, testing, showing of good character or other idicia of fitness, or genuineness?
It sounds to me like Fox News and some others are starting to have an effect.
The Founders specified that "Congress shall make no law...." Too bad they didn't stop right there.
Do they have any licensing, educational requirements, testing, showing of good character or other idicia of fitness, or genuineness?
It sounds to me like Fox News and some others are starting to have an effect.
The Founders specified that "Congress shall make no law...." Too bad they didn't stop right there.