House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Locked
User avatar

PBR
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 742
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:16 am

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#211

Post by PBR »

harrycallahan wrote:
Journey?
Oh, Neil Diamond?
kenny rogers - the gambler
Houston, Tx.
DPS Received - Jan. 26th
Received Pin# - Feb. 25th
IN HAND!!!!!! June 9th

DevilDawg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:53 pm

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#212

Post by DevilDawg »

While it is too early to give up the hope completely I sent both my Rep and Senator an email thanking them for their support on these two important bills. I wanted them to receive some positive reinforcement for their hard works. I asked them to keep up the fight until the very end. It might not matter to them, and they likely won't read the emails. For me and mine, I would rather use honey than vinegar.

We can always get the detailed reports from Chas later and ensure that the ones who are either intentionally using misinformation and lies, or are simply too stupid to be trusted are removed from power.
User avatar

safety1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 595
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:13 am

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#213

Post by safety1 »

http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/ho ... er-premium" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Good read guys!
We gotta stay positive.
We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions. ~ Ronald Reagan ~
NRA - Life Member

gljjt
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 826
Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 9:31 pm

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#214

Post by gljjt »

sugar land dave wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Tracker wrote:what nobody is talking about but what I'm seeing is that if HB910 dies then so does the $200 Class C misdemeanor for accidental 30.06 violations.
That will be a bigger loss than open-carry.

Chas.
That is what I meant by my earlier post about OCT people not taking an easy 90 % win. If I had my choice, I would have taken that penalty reduction even over open carry, but we could have had them both.
But penalty reduction and licensed open carry don't benefit the president of OCT.

gljjt
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 826
Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 9:31 pm

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#215

Post by gljjt »

PBR wrote:Well looks like -- Appointed (05/27/2015) Phillips (Chair) | Burns | Geren | King, Phil | Nevárez (2 voted for it 3 against it)

Will be overseeing the committee for the House, when and where can you see who from the Senate will be there and when this committee will get started on this?
Phil King voted nay, but he supports OC. I am sure he will do everything he can to get OC moving in conference. In spite of his vote today, he is in the "us" camp. I think we should hold public anger until all is said and done. This thing is so close, let's don't throw a wrench in the gears. Contacting our reps in anger and threatening to vote for someone else next election probably would cause more harm than good. IMHO.
User avatar

Blindref757
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 508
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:40 pm
Location: Denton

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#216

Post by Blindref757 »

Just spent some time on the OCT facebook page. Jon Jononymous sounds an awful lot like someone here at TexasCHLforum.com...someone who knows the system really well! :coolgleamA:
User avatar

sugar land dave
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 16
Posts: 1396
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:03 am
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#217

Post by sugar land dave »

gljjt wrote:
PBR wrote:Well looks like -- Appointed (05/27/2015) Phillips (Chair) | Burns | Geren | King, Phil | Nevárez (2 voted for it 3 against it)

Will be overseeing the committee for the House, when and where can you see who from the Senate will be there and when this committee will get started on this?
Phil King voted nay, but he supports OC. I am sure he will do everything he can to get OC moving in conference. In spite of his vote today, he is in the "us" camp. I think we should hold public anger until all is said and done. This thing is so close, let's don't throw a wrench in the gears. Contacting our reps in anger and threatening to vote for someone else next election probably would cause more harm than good. IMHO.
That's what the OCT guys did and we know how that turned out.....
Last edited by sugar land dave on Wed May 27, 2015 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DPS Received Forms- 1/18/11 Online Status - 1/27/11 My Mailbox - 2/12/11
NRA Life Member
User avatar

safety1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 595
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:13 am

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#218

Post by safety1 »

gljjt wrote:
PBR wrote:Well looks like -- Appointed (05/27/2015) Phillips (Chair) | Burns | Geren | King, Phil | Nevárez (2 voted for it 3 against it)

Will be overseeing the committee for the House, when and where can you see who from the Senate will be there and when this committee will get started on this?
Phil King voted nay, but he supports OC. I am sure he will do everything he can to get OC moving in conference. In spite of his vote today, he is in the "us" camp. I think we should hold public anger until all is said and done. This thing is so close, let's don't throw a wrench in the gears. Contacting our reps in anger and threatening to vote for someone else next election probably would cause more harm than good. IMHO.
I agree, lets hold our anger until Sunday night.
We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions. ~ Ronald Reagan ~
NRA - Life Member
User avatar

RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 5038
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#219

Post by RPBrown »

I will hold my theories and statements until it is over. I have been afraid of this for sometime though and have said so here.
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#220

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

Blindref757 wrote:Just spent some time on the OCT facebook page. Jon Jononymous sounds an awful lot like someone here at TexasCHLforum.com...someone who knows the system really well! :coolgleamA:
It's not me, if that's what you think.

Chas.

The Wall
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:59 am

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#221

Post by The Wall »

You never know we might end up with something better. Especially if these guys stop acting like the idiots in DC instead of Texans.

Tracker
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:51 am

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#222

Post by Tracker »

Chas, not to change the subject (not really by much) but with 20/20 hindsight what would've been the chance of getting HB 308 through without being gutted? It just seems to that campus carry had to get passed first.
User avatar

PBR
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 742
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:16 am

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#223

Post by PBR »

Blindref757 wrote:Just spent some time on the OCT facebook page. Jon Jononymous sounds an awful lot like someone here at TexasCHLforum.com...someone who knows the system really well! :coolgleamA:
been on huffines page too
Houston, Tx.
DPS Received - Jan. 26th
Received Pin# - Feb. 25th
IN HAND!!!!!! June 9th
User avatar

sugar land dave
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 16
Posts: 1396
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:03 am
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#224

Post by sugar land dave »

I sent my representative the following brief note:

"Honorable sir,

The military has been family in one way or another for about half my life, so your background assures my continued support of you, but I would ask that you please not allow others to penalize supporters of HB910 for the sins of certain Democrats (Dutton & Huffines).

You changed your previous yes vote to a no tonight. That puts HB910 in jeopardy, effectively allowing the feelings of 79,000 law enforcement officers to deny reduced 30.06 penaties and licensed open carry for 825,000 law abiding citizens of Texas. While I am sure that you have many eloquent words that you can tell me, let me assure you that like a guy named Paul from an old Good Book, I am observant of actions, not words.

If there is any way that you can rescue HB910 from a slow death in committee, I and 824,999 other lawful licensed Texans would appreciate it.

Stay well and keep up the good fight!"

I signed it, gave my name, address, email, and phone number. I will not be an anonymous person to my doctor, nor to my politician. Some things are too important.
DPS Received Forms- 1/18/11 Online Status - 1/27/11 My Mailbox - 2/12/11
NRA Life Member
User avatar

safety1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 595
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:13 am

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11

#225

Post by safety1 »

RPBrown wrote:I will hold my theories and statements until it is over. I have been afraid of this for sometime though and have said so here.
I hope we have something to cheer about before then Brother!
Let's keep a positive outlook, I just feel like something good is going to happen.
We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions. ~ Ronald Reagan ~
NRA - Life Member
Locked

Return to “2015 Legislative Session”