HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Locked
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 15
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#181

Post by mojo84 »

That's when the real quid pro quo can start. People will hold out their support for more money for their pet projects and cronies.

Votes for sale.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

Jason K
Banned
Posts in topic: 13
Posts: 336
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:57 am
Location: Close to Waco....but not too close.

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#182

Post by Jason K »

mojo84 wrote:That's when the real quid pro quo can start. People will hold out their support for more money for their pet projects and cronies.

Votes for sale.
And it's also why I think Strauss will let OC and Campus Carry pass....he's got other irons in the fire that he has to spend political capital on.
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 15
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#183

Post by mojo84 »

Jason K wrote:
mojo84 wrote:That's when the real quid pro quo can start. People will hold out their support for more money for their pet projects and cronies.

Votes for sale.
And it's also why I think Strauss will let OC and Campus Carry pass....he's got other irons in the fire that he has to spend political capital on.
I agree.

In the back of my mind I'm now wondering, oh no, what's this going to cost me?

I just can't help the cynicism nowadays.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Topic author
TVGuy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 37
Posts: 1088
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:47 am
Location: DFW

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#184

Post by TVGuy »

Why can't we see or find out what the precise substitute bill that passed committee is?
User avatar

Jasonw560
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1294
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 4:45 pm
Location: Harlingen, TX

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#185

Post by Jasonw560 »

Because it hasn't gotten out of committee yet.
NRA EPL pending life member

"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government"- Patrick Henry
User avatar

Topic author
TVGuy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 37
Posts: 1088
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:47 am
Location: DFW

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#186

Post by TVGuy »

Jasonw560 wrote:Because it hasn't gotten out of committee yet.
CSHB 910 was voted out favorably yesterday from Homeland Security.

hansdedrich
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 18
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 7:43 pm

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#187

Post by hansdedrich »

"It is an exception to the application of this subsection that the handgun was partially or wholly visible but was carried in a shoulder or belt holster by the license holder."

Are we again having to guess at what the law is? C'mon. If I have my pistol on an IWB holster and my shirt blows up, will I be arrested for brandishing - or an OWB holster with my shirt covering it, will I be arrested for concealment? In other words, if my pistol is in a holster, can I wear or not wear any kind of clothes I choose? These damn laws are legal speak and don't make sense - you have to go to court to find out what you did opr didn't do. Maybe that's the plan, more attorney fees and court action??
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#188

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

hansdedrich wrote:"It is an exception to the application of this subsection that the handgun was partially or wholly visible but was carried in a shoulder or belt holster by the license holder."

Are we again having to guess at what the law is? C'mon. If I have my pistol on an IWB holster and my shirt blows up, will I be arrested for brandishing - or an OWB holster with my shirt covering it, will I be arrested for concealment? In other words, if my pistol is in a holster, can I wear or not wear any kind of clothes I choose? These darn laws are legal speak and don't make sense - you have to go to court to find out what you did opr didn't do. Maybe that's the plan, more attorney fees and court action??
There's nothing confusing or ambiguous at all. You can carry concealed in any way you like. If open-carry passes as in SB17/HB910, then you can still carry concealed in any way you like, or you can carry openly with a belt or shoulder holster.

Chas.
User avatar

Glockster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
Location: Kingwood, TX

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#189

Post by Glockster »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
hansdedrich wrote:"It is an exception to the application of this subsection that the handgun was partially or wholly visible but was carried in a shoulder or belt holster by the license holder."

Are we again having to guess at what the law is? C'mon. If I have my pistol on an IWB holster and my shirt blows up, will I be arrested for brandishing - or an OWB holster with my shirt covering it, will I be arrested for concealment? In other words, if my pistol is in a holster, can I wear or not wear any kind of clothes I choose? These darn laws are legal speak and don't make sense - you have to go to court to find out what you did opr didn't do. Maybe that's the plan, more attorney fees and court action??
There's nothing confusing or ambiguous at all. You can carry concealed in any way you like. If open-carry passes as in SB17/HB910, then you can still carry concealed in any way you like, or you can carry openly with a belt or shoulder holster.

Chas.

What I'm still unsure of is what exactly is a "belt or shoulder holster" -- is there a definition (as don't recall seeing that)? My specific question would be whether a FOBUS paddle retention holster is a "belt" holster as it clips over my belt.
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?

hansdedrich
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 18
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 7:43 pm

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#190

Post by hansdedrich »

So what you are saying is that - You can carry your holstered gun anywhere and any way you want to carry it - concealed, open, in the belt, out of the belt, on your ankle, around your neck, around your thigh, around your chest, under your shirt, outside of your shirt, half outside of your shirt, 3'4 outside your shirt, half concealed, half open, anyway you prefer as long as it is holstered and not Mexican carry?

CJD
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:38 pm
Location: Conroe

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#191

Post by CJD »

hansdedrich wrote:So what you are saying is that - You can carry your holstered gun anywhere and any way you want to carry it - concealed, open, in the belt, out of the belt, on your ankle, around your neck, around your thigh, around your chest, under your shirt, outside of your shirt, half outside of your shirt, 3'4 outside your shirt, half concealed, half open, anyway you prefer as long as it is holstered and not Mexican carry?
No, only "belt or shoulder" if open. No ankle carry.

hansdedrich
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 18
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 7:43 pm

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#192

Post by hansdedrich »

If I am open carrying in the winter and my coat covers it but the end sticks out? Is that okay?? Or if I am concealed carry and my gun prints on my tee shirt?

hansdedrich
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 18
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 7:43 pm

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#193

Post by hansdedrich »

Sorry , one more, Is an IWB holster with the butt showing considered open or concealed??

louisf1
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 4:32 pm

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#194

Post by louisf1 »

Partially covered would be open carry. Fully covered would be canceled. Please go read the proposed bills.

hansdedrich
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 18
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 7:43 pm

Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now

#195

Post by hansdedrich »

Okay, here's the section below. Question: Is an inside the belt holster that is attached to the belt legally considered 'being carried in a belt holster'? In that case, only the butt of the gun would show.

Also: what does this mean? "Intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries"

(a) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder carries a handgun on or about the license holder's person under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, and intentionally displays the handgun in plain view of another person in a public place. It is an exception to the application of this subsection that the handgun was partially or wholly visible but was carried in a shoulder or belt holster by the license holder.
(b) A license holder commits an offense if the license holder intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries a handgun under the authority of Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, regardless of whether the handgun is concealed or carried in a shoulder or belt holster, on or about the license holder's person:
Locked

Return to “2015 Legislative Session”