The only rule close to anything prohibited naming [the prepaid legal service which shall not be named] would be the rule between #12 and #13:Jason K wrote:Any reason that the [a prepaid legal service] 's name can't be mentioned? I know other threads have specifically mentioned [a prepaid legal service] by name several times with no moderator intervention. Is this a new policy?Blue Demon wrote:I am a member of [a prepaid legal service] and would have called them immediately.
[Moderator edit.]
BTW, keep us informed on this case. This seems like an opportunity for TSRA, NRA, OCT, or any other pro-2A organization to help set some precedent to the 30.06 law.
Except it's obvious that this [a prepaid legal service] is not his business.TexasCHLforum is non-commercial!! With limited exceptions set out below in Rules 13, 14 & 18, do not advertise your business.
Are we not allowed to talk about prepaid legal services that deal primarily in firearms cases on this firearm-oriented forum? I don't think Blue Demon was intending to advertise for them, but was simply adding to the discussion what he would do.
That being said, the [prepaid legal service] would not have defended you (at least if it's the [prepaid legal service] I'm thinking of) because walking past the sign was not a "use" of the firearm. Uses of the firearm include drawing and/or firing your weapon, but do not include walking into a prohibited area. Even though this area was technically not prohibited, it still isn't a use of the weapon.