Testimony was taken in the last meeting, so should we be expecting a vote today?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Testimony was taken, but the Bill was not voted. All bills in that committee are "left pending" until the next committee hearing. Then some bills are voted on, some are not. Those that are not are either undergoing changes, or are dead.TVGuy wrote:did anyone catch the first 30-45 minutes of the Homeland Security committee meeting. Was any action taken on 910? (or any other pending bills for that matter)
Chas.
HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 37
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:47 am
- Location: DFW
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Some believe they are waiting for SB17 to be assigned to the committee so they can substitute it in and simplify the process. This cannot happen yet as SB17 has not been assigned to committee.TVGuy wrote:Testimony was taken in the last meeting, so should we be expecting a vote today?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Testimony was taken, but the Bill was not voted. All bills in that committee are "left pending" until the next committee hearing. Then some bills are voted on, some are not. Those that are not are either undergoing changes, or are dead.TVGuy wrote:did anyone catch the first 30-45 minutes of the Homeland Security committee meeting. Was any action taken on 910? (or any other pending bills for that matter)
Chas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 15
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
- Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Who assigns the bills to the committees?
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 9551
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
- Location: Fort Worth
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Should I view it as a positive that the only objections seem to be coming from hospitals?
General anti-2A folks notwithstanding.
General anti-2A folks notwithstanding.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 37
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:47 am
- Location: DFW
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
It's HB 308 testimony. Much of it has to do with hospitals.RoyGBiv wrote:Should I view it as a positive that the only objections seem to be coming from hospitals?
General anti-2A folks notwithstanding.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 14
- Posts: 9316
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
- Location: Arlington
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
I'll go out on a limb and say the Speaker of the House assigns a bill to committee when first introduced.....but don't hold me to that.mojo84 wrote:Who assigns the bills to the committees?
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
That is correct. On first reading in the House, the Speaker assigns the bill to a committee.joe817 wrote:I'll go out on a limb and say the Speaker of the House assigns a bill to committee when first introduced.....but don't hold me to that.mojo84 wrote:Who assigns the bills to the committees?
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Read in the House rules that bills approved by the Senate are to receive first reading and assignment to committee as soon as "practicable". SB 17 was received in the House a week ago tomorrow. If SB 17 has not been assigned to a committee by the end of this week, I'm thinking it is pretty clear that the Speaker is stalling.
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
SB 17 wasn't received by the House until last Friday (four days ago).Srnewby wrote:Read in the House rules that bills approved by the Senate are to receive first reading and assignment to committee as soon as "practicable". SB 17 was received in the House a week ago tomorrow. If SB 17 has not been assigned to a committee by the end of this week, I'm thinking it is pretty clear that the Speaker is stalling.
Of the 32 Senate bills thus far received by the House (some of which were received weeks before SB 17), two have been referred to committee.
We don't gain anything by jumping to conclusions.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 12
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Correct! Something is working, so rest easy folks. This isn't a guarantee, but there's no reason to suspect a conspiracy at this point.Bladed wrote:SB 17 wasn't received by the House until last Friday (four days ago).Srnewby wrote:Read in the House rules that bills approved by the Senate are to receive first reading and assignment to committee as soon as "practicable". SB 17 was received in the House a week ago tomorrow. If SB 17 has not been assigned to a committee by the end of this week, I'm thinking it is pretty clear that the Speaker is stalling.
Of the 32 Senate bills thus far received by the House (some of which were received weeks before SB 17), two have been referred to committee.
We don't gain anything by jumping to conclusions.
Chas.
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 13
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:57 am
- Location: Close to Waco....but not too close.
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Is government.....is always reason to suspect conspiracy.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Correct! Something is working, so rest easy folks. This isn't a guarantee, but there's no reason to suspect a conspiracy at this point.Bladed wrote:SB 17 wasn't received by the House until last Friday (four days ago).Srnewby wrote:Read in the House rules that bills approved by the Senate are to receive first reading and assignment to committee as soon as "practicable". SB 17 was received in the House a week ago tomorrow. If SB 17 has not been assigned to a committee by the end of this week, I'm thinking it is pretty clear that the Speaker is stalling.
Of the 32 Senate bills thus far received by the House (some of which were received weeks before SB 17), two have been referred to committee.
We don't gain anything by jumping to conclusions.
Chas.
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Fair enough Charles. Thanks for the update.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Correct! Something is working, so rest easy folks. This isn't a guarantee, but there's no reason to suspect a conspiracy at this point.Bladed wrote:SB 17 wasn't received by the House until last Friday (four days ago).Srnewby wrote:Read in the House rules that bills approved by the Senate are to receive first reading and assignment to committee as soon as "practicable". SB 17 was received in the House a week ago tomorrow. If SB 17 has not been assigned to a committee by the end of this week, I'm thinking it is pretty clear that the Speaker is stalling.
Of the 32 Senate bills thus far received by the House (some of which were received weeks before SB 17), two have been referred to committee.
We don't gain anything by jumping to conclusions.
Chas.
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
Fair enough Charles. Thanks for the update.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Correct! Something is working, so rest easy folks. This isn't a guarantee, but there's no reason to suspect a conspiracy at this point.Bladed wrote:SB 17 wasn't received by the House until last Friday (four days ago).Srnewby wrote:Read in the House rules that bills approved by the Senate are to receive first reading and assignment to committee as soon as "practicable". SB 17 was received in the House a week ago tomorrow. If SB 17 has not been assigned to a committee by the end of this week, I'm thinking it is pretty clear that the Speaker is stalling.
Of the 32 Senate bills thus far received by the House (some of which were received weeks before SB 17), two have been referred to committee.
We don't gain anything by jumping to conclusions.
Chas.
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
"Reported favorably as substituted"
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 13
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:57 am
- Location: Close to Waco....but not too close.
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
That seems to be good news.....CJD wrote:"Reported favorably as substituted"