Charles:
I noticed that there are no HJRs mentioned in the list of bills. Most of them are matched by enabling legislation so this is not a problem, but I don't ant anyone to miss this resolution. It is a proposal for a constitutional amendment on our right to bear arms in Texas and it takes away the phrase authorizing the legislature to regulate it.
I would like to see it added to the tracking, if possible. I do not know what the legal process is for resolutions like this to make it to the ballot, so some explanation of how it differs from a bill might also help. I think it does not take a governor's signature, but I am not positive about even that.
Assuming it passes and is voted in, what are the ramifications of this? I could see where courts could say it makes no difference and could almost strike down all gun laws in Texas. I doubt the second is probable, which means I think it is unlikely to make a significant difference in anything.
HJR 56
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5298
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
HJR 56
Steve Rothstein
Re: HJR 56
I would like to see this tracked and rated as well, I believe a JR is how a proposed amendment to the constitution would have to be moved forward. But I think this is icing on the cake. If strong bills pass the only use for this would be to bar future legislative items without another constitutional amendment.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: HJR 56
I add everything to the Bill Status Report, but sometimes I can't do it everyday.
HJR56 is a constitutional amendment that would remove legislative authority to regulate the wearing of arms. It has little chance of passing and if it does, the real battle would be in the public vote on the proposed amendment.
Chas.
HJR56 is a constitutional amendment that would remove legislative authority to regulate the wearing of arms. It has little chance of passing and if it does, the real battle would be in the public vote on the proposed amendment.
Chas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 794
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:35 pm
- Location: White Hall, Ar
Re: HJR 56
Would it, by default, take away the state preemption and maybe allow cities and local municipalities to write their own laws?
N5PNZ
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: HJR 56
No, it would be another impediment to local regulation. What the state cannot do because of constitutional protection, local governments cannot do either.2farnorth wrote:Would it, by default, take away the state preemption and maybe allow cities and local municipalities to write their own laws?
Chas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
- Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)
Re: HJR 56
While a long shot, it would be nice if it would pass.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: HJR 56
It would be tremendous!!mojo84 wrote:While a long shot, it would be nice if it would pass.
Chas.