03Lightningrocks wrote: Unfortunately, I type so slow, I have two options.
Slowly... you type slowly. haha
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
03Lightningrocks wrote: Unfortunately, I type so slow, I have two options.
Irregardless... .... That is my excuse and I am sticking with it.Scott in Houston wrote:03Lightningrocks wrote: Unfortunately, I type so slow, I have two options.
Slowly... you type slowly. haha
for realz?Abraham wrote:Using the letter Z instead of S at the end of words.
HKMike wrote:Overuse and misuse of the word "literally." It drives me up the wall! For example someone says, "my head literally exploded." I would like to see that.
I literally don't think that you would like to see that.HKMike wrote:Overuse and misuse of the word "literally." It drives me up the wall! For example someone says, "my head literally exploded." I would like to see that.
Like the ending of this? " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Rex B wrote:HKMike wrote:Overuse and misuse of the word "literally." It drives me up the wall! For example someone says, "my head literally exploded." I would like to see that.
WildBill wrote:Fixed Income [Flame Suit On]
I know this term is usually applied to people who are retired, disability, pensions, etc.
I am fortunate enough to still be working full time, but I am still on a "fixed income".
Every two weeks, I get the same amount of income.
I am on salary so I can't work extra hours for extra pay.
I think that the real issue is amount of the income coming in, not that fact that it is fixed.
I would like to have a $100,000 per year fixed income.
Thanks! I feel better after watching that.pancho wrote:Like the ending of this? " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Rex B wrote:HKMike wrote:Overuse and misuse of the word "literally." It drives me up the wall! For example someone says, "my head literally exploded." I would like to see that.
Pikers! I want to be in that $250,000 bracket the current POTUS speaks of.pancho wrote:WildBill wrote:Fixed Income [Flame Suit On]
I know this term is usually applied to people who are retired, disability, pensions, etc.
I am fortunate enough to still be working full time, but I am still on a "fixed income".
Every two weeks, I get the same amount of income.
I am on salary so I can't work extra hours for extra pay.
I think that the real issue is amount of the income coming in, not that fact that it is fixed.
I would like to have a $100,000 per year fixed income.
In some recent years, retirees got bigger COLA increases than I did.
I don't like "single mother" either. It is often misleading. Some are single mothers, some are divorced, some are widowed. To me, single mother means never married.WildBill wrote:Single Mother [Flame Suit On]
IMO, the way this term is popularly used lumps women into a single group and views them like they are somehow inferior.
I don't think that being single or a mother is a protected class or need special treatment.
Some women are married and some are single. Does that make either group better than the other?
Some women are mothers and some are not. Some are good mothers, some are not.
Some "single mothers" are better off single than when they were married and should not be pitied.
The thing that bothers me most is that I have a feeling that it's a euphemism for something else.