So you agree that how one carries can make a difference it's just that you don't think the manner in this case would be sufficient. Well that's fine because I never said that I think it should be enough either. Mind you I believe the court has said so by the verdict, but if it were left to me I don't think I would tend that way. What I don't agree with is tha automatic assumption of ill will to everyone who disagrees.JP171 wrote: Seriously though I could see the " in a manner calculated to cause alarm if the weapon was being carried at combat ready, high or low ready but it was none of these, it was capricious and arbitrary on the part of officers and he was arrested simply for contempt of cop. The DA chased all he could find just to support the officers instead of doing the right thing and telling the officers they were in a dark stinky place.
MISTRIAL/CONVICTION: Ft. Hood soldier's case to carry AR15
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton