Word use that drives you up the wall!

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 148
Posts: 8400
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#91

Post by Abraham »

Erudite pronounced as: Area-Dite

On accident, instead of by accident.

Or incorporating some hackneyed bit of word flotsam stolen from a T.V. commercial as in: "I could've stayed at Holiday Inn Express last night" and then proudly act as if these dreary pearls of non-wit are their own, not comprehending how ghastly platitudinal they sound.

bdickens
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#92

Post by bdickens »

Abraham wrote:... not comprehending how ghastly platitudinal they sound.

Since we're on the subject anyway...

ghastily platitudinal
Byron Dickens

MeMelYup
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 1874
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#93

Post by MeMelYup »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
bdickens wrote:Imply and infer.

One implies to and infers from.

But what really drives me up the wall is when people can't seem to understand the plain meaning of simple, basic English phrases like "shall not be infringed" and "the right of the people."
That one's simple. If you're a collectivist (in all things), then "The People" is a collectivist term. Therefore, The People may be armed through the agency of appointed enforcers and bureaucrats and armies, but not individually. The People's this. The People's that. The People's Republic of Californiastan. If you're a conservative/libertarian, then you properly understand the rights of the people as individual rights.

One of my latest bugaboos...... "Pivot," which from Obama has come to mean "more of the same."
Doesn't "the right of the People" indicate the individual, where "the People's rights" would indicate the mass?
User avatar

G26ster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 13
Posts: 2655
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:28 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#94

Post by G26ster »

MeMelYup wrote: Doesn't "the right of the People" indicate the individual, where "the People's rights" would indicate the mass?
Both people and persons are the plural of person. (Google :lol: )

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 148
Posts: 8400
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#95

Post by Abraham »

bdickens,

I confirmed the spelling of the word Ghastly and indeed I had it correctly spelled, however

Ghastily was nowhere to be found in my dictionary.

Please tell the name me of the dictionary that contains: Ghastily.

Thanks

Some of the other non-words commonly used on the internet: Noone and alot

Congratulations spelled Congradulations

Lose and loose continue to fall through the cracks. These words stump a lot of people and I've yet to understand why...?

I just love to read where someone took a coarse or needed to take a brake.

Before I sound to highfalutin, I have a confession to make. I'm hopeless with proper punctuation placement. So, we all have our word crosses to bear...

bdickens
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#96

Post by bdickens »

Ghastly is indeed the correct spelling. It is the wrong word.

Ghastily is the adverbial form of ghastly.

"not comprehending how ghastily platitudinal they sound" is an adverbial phrase wherein the words "ghastily" and "platitudinal" are used to modify the verb "to sound."
Byron Dickens

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 148
Posts: 8400
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#97

Post by Abraham »

bdickens ,

O.K., but why isn't the word "Ghastily" not found in the dictionary?

Surely, you're not being whimsical?

If a word isn't found in the dictionary it's use appears without credibility...

P.S. this exchange is fun for me and I sincerely hope for you. Also, if I'm found wrong in my argument, I'll happily stand corrected.

Of course, I'm not wrong...

bdickens
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#98

Post by bdickens »

I am not being whimsical. I am being correct.

There are plenty of legitimate words not found in "the dictionary."

Say "hearty ate" and then say "heartily ate" out loud. Which one sounds correct?
Byron Dickens

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 148
Posts: 8400
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#99

Post by Abraham »

"There are plenty of legitimate words not found in "the dictionary."

Really?

Like Ebonics?

bdickens
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#100

Post by bdickens »

Um, yeah. Really.

And my ABD (that's All But Dissertation to you non-academics) wife who went through a Doctoral program in English Literature agrees with me.

But I'll bet you that the 20-volume OED has the word "ghastily" in it.
Byron Dickens

LikesShinyThings
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 537
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:57 pm
Location: Kingsland, TX

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#101

Post by LikesShinyThings »

Abraham wrote:bdickens ,

O.K., but why isn't the word "Ghastily" not found in the dictionary?

Surely, you're not being whimsical?

If a word isn't found in the dictionary it's use appears without credibility...

P.S. this exchange is fun for me and I sincerely hope for you. Also, if I'm found wrong in my argument, I'll happily stand corrected.

Of course, I'm not wrong...
Found it: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ghastily
TSRA Life Member, NRA Benefactor Member, TX CHL
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#102

Post by jimlongley »

I worked with a gentleman, many years ago, who would comment, as we finished a job, that he had to gather all his "derbis."

It wasn't until I had worked with him for a while that I realized he meant "debris" and mispronounced just as he did "ambliance."
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365

BigGuy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1038
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:36 am
Contact:

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#103

Post by BigGuy »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
bdickens wrote:Imply and infer.

One implies to and infers from.

But what really drives me up the wall is when people can't seem to understand the plain meaning of simple, basic English phrases like "shall not be infringed" and "the right of the people."
That one's simple. If you're a collectivist (in all things), then "The People" is a collectivist term. Therefore, The People may be armed through the agency of appointed enforcers and bureaucrats and armies, but not individually. The People's this. The People's that. The People's Republic of Californiastan. If you're a conservative/libertarian, then you properly understand the rights of the people as individual rights.

One of my latest bugaboos...... "Pivot," which from Obama has come to mean "more of the same."
Jump to 1:50 for the punch line.
[youtube][/youtube]

texanjoker

Re: Word use that drives you up the wall!

#104

Post by texanjoker »

"right"

that annoys the heck outta me..right ;-)
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”