51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

fickman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1711
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:52 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

#16

Post by fickman »

OP: are you sure your significant other didn't put that sign in there???

"rlol"
Native Texian
User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

#17

Post by Beiruty »

Let us forget about the 51% sign are the girls attractive and friendly? :mrgreen:
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member

longtooth
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 12329
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Angelina County

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

#18

Post by longtooth »

Make sure this does not stray & get it locked for inuendo.
Remember G-rated men.
Be Gentlemen.
Image
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
User avatar

tacticool
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

#19

Post by tacticool »

Ultra_Solo_Sig_0904 wrote:they're food and other things are :smash: 'ing :thumbs2:
Them's good eatin'?
When in doubt
Vote them out!
User avatar

Glock_Tacular
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:07 am
Location: Dallas

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

#20

Post by Glock_Tacular »

Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?
CHL - May 2012
P.P.O - May 2012
[Pre-paid legal service]
User avatar

jmorris
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1540
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:41 pm
Location: La Vernia
Contact:

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

#21

Post by jmorris »

Glock_Tacular wrote:Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?
Not illegal, just invalid.

Where are your facts that they are anti-gun?

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Hanlon's razor
Jay E Morris,
Guardian Firearm Training, NRA Pistol, LTC < retired from all
NRA Lifetime, TSRA Lifetime
NRA Recruiter (link)

bdickens
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

#22

Post by bdickens »

Glock_Tacular wrote:Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?

All they are promoting is that they don't know what sign is what.
Byron Dickens
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 18502
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

#23

Post by Keith B »

jmorris wrote:
Glock_Tacular wrote:Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?
Not illegal, just invalid.
Actually, it is illegal. A improperly placed 51% sign is a violation of TABC code. However, I expect they just placed the wrong sign out of ignorance. If I recall correctly they receive both the blue 'Unlicensed Possession' sign and the 51% sign in the packet, so they just put the wrong one up. The local TABC office needs to be called about the improper posting of the 51% sign and they will have them correct it and put up the correct Unlicensed Possession (<51%) sign.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

Glock_Tacular
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:07 am
Location: Dallas

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

#24

Post by Glock_Tacular »

jmorris wrote:
Glock_Tacular wrote:Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?
Not illegal, just invalid.

Where are your facts that they are anti-gun?

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Hanlon's razor

Improper posted 51% is stupidity, sir.
CHL - May 2012
P.P.O - May 2012
[Pre-paid legal service]
User avatar

jmorris
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1540
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:41 pm
Location: La Vernia
Contact:

Re: 51% Sign at Irving Twin Peaks

#25

Post by jmorris »

Glock_Tacular wrote:
jmorris wrote:
Glock_Tacular wrote:Why would you even eat in a resturant that is "promoting", with the illegally posted 51%, that they aren't gun friendly?
Not illegal, just invalid.

Where are your facts that they are anti-gun?

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Hanlon's razor

Improper posted 51% is stupidity, sir.
Exactly!
Jay E Morris,
Guardian Firearm Training, NRA Pistol, LTC < retired from all
NRA Lifetime, TSRA Lifetime
NRA Recruiter (link)
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”