Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


tommyg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:59 am
Location: Dale, TX

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#706

Post by tommyg »

Travis County (Austin) Apprasal district has a sign that is almost a 3006 sign but the wording is not completely right
N.R.A. benefactor Member :tiphat: Please Support the N.R.A. :patriot:
User avatar

nightmare69
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 2046
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:03 pm
Location: East Texas

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#707

Post by nightmare69 »

East Texas gun shows that are held in city owned buildings are posted during the show. The Modd Cobb convention building in Longview and the Harvey Hall convention center in Tyler are both posted during the gun show.
2/26-Mailed paper app and packet.
5/20-Plastic in hand.
83 days mailbox to mailbox.

cb1000rider
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 2505
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:27 pm

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#708

Post by cb1000rider »

Austin gun shows in Cedar Park Texas are correctly posted on city owned buildings.
Querying the LEOs at that location, they indicated that they wouldn't arrest on the issue.

cprems
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 2:07 am

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#709

Post by cprems »

How does one file a complaint against a City for improper 30.06 postings?

I live in a small town that has a PD with the front door posted 30.06. As far as I am aware there is the PD dispatch and records/PD offices at this location. Also City hall is also posted with the 30.06. The two buildings are separate. There is a room for council meetings and the utilities department.

For what the law states that they cannot post it off limits, unless, there is voting going on or a council meeting is actually in progress.

Am I wrong?

Has the Texas AG addressed this in an opinion? Can I as a private citizen with a CHL ask for such an opinion?
04/01/2013 - Online application
06/22/2013 - Plastic in hand
75 days - mailbox to mailbox
03/17 - renewal - 42 days plastic in hand
User avatar

airbornecpa
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 12:06 pm

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#710

Post by airbornecpa »

Small town? Know anyone one the city council? Or go to a city council meeting and bring to their attention. The city attorney will likely be at the meeting.
Last edited by airbornecpa on Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 31
Posts: 7783
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#711

Post by puma guy »

airbornecpa wrote:Small town? Know anyone one the city council? Or go to a city council meeting and bring to there attention. The city attorney will likely be at the meeting.
Take a copy/ copies of the law with exemption highlighted. Hand them to council and city attorney.
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!

JT69
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:42 pm

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#712

Post by JT69 »

So in our new laws that went in afect today! The one On the legal posting of the 30.06 sign!! I guess it failed ?

TexasCajun
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 1554
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:58 pm
Location: La Marque, TX

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#713

Post by TexasCajun »

JT69 wrote:So in our new laws that went in afect today! The one On the legal posting of the 30.06 sign!! I guess it failed ?
Correct. That bill did not pass during the last session.
Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice.
NRA TSRA TFC CHL: 9/22/12, PSC Member: 10/2012

JT69
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:42 pm

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#714

Post by JT69 »

Ok thanks that's what I thought! It's a shame

MAJShepherd
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 7:44 am

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#715

Post by MAJShepherd »

I've been out of the state/country for 13 years and I'm still brushing up on all my TX CC rules/laws. However, the city recreation center here in Harker Heights has posted the 30.06 sign. Harker Heights is a suburb in vicinity of Fort Hood. The City Hall and public library do not have the 30.06 sign. My two oldest children take fencing lessons there at the rec center. When I asked why the sign was posted, the response was that one of the employee's boyfriends had threatened her. Makes no sense. If there is an example letter out there that would help me write the city counsel then I would greatly appreciate it if someone would post it or point me in the right direction.

Thanks,
Shepherd
MAJ, USA
User avatar

TheArmedFarmer
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: Grapevine

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#716

Post by TheArmedFarmer »

Just outside Waco, the Carleen Bright Arboretum in Woodway (a beautiful arboretum, by the way) is on city property, and they recently posted a 30.06 sign on the welcome board that you drive past upon entering.

Below is what I sent to the manager of the arboretum. She did reply and said she'd pass along the information.
In the Texas Penal Code, 30.06 (the very section that prescribes
the method of the posting of these signs) it says under
subsection (e):

"(e) It is an exception to the application of this section
that the property on which the license holder carries a handgun
is owned or leased by a governmental entity and is not a premises
or other place on which the license holder is prohibited from
carrying the handgun under Section 46.03 or 46.035."

In other words, if it's government property and carry is not
prohibited for another reason (such as being a bar or a
courthouse, etc) then the 30.06 sign is unenforceable.

This does not mean the sign at the arboretum is illegal or
otherwise unlawful. But it does mean that it is completely
un-necessary and unenforceable.
Life member: NRA, THSC, HSLDA.
User avatar

Topic author
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 28
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#717

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

HB508 would have stopped these blatant attempts to intimidate Texans by creating a $10,500 a day per sign fine for governmental entities and agencies posting unenforceable 30.06 signs. Thanks to Sen. Dan Patrick, we don't have that bill and now he wants to be Lt. Governor and control legislation that gets to the floor in the Senate.

Chas.

GrillKing
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 615
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 12:35 pm

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#718

Post by GrillKing »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:HB508 would have stopped these blatant attempts to intimidate Texans by creating a $10,500 a day per sign fine for governmental entities and agencies posting unenforceable 30.06 signs. Thanks to Sen. Dan Patrick, we don't have that bill and now he wants to be Lt. Governor and control legislation that gets to the floor in the Senate.

Chas.
And that's why I am supporting Jerry Patterson for Lt. Governor. Abbott and Patterson, it doesn't get better than that for true 2nd Amendment support!

karlac
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:54 am

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#719

Post by karlac »

City of West University Place, TX has a 30.06 sign on their Rec Center on Bellaire Blvd and West Point St. Wording appears correct, but it is very difficult to read, and photograph, since it is not on a contrasting background.
IMG_1944.JPG

JKTex
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 38
Posts: 368
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:28 am
Location: Flower Mound

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#720

Post by JKTex »

karlac wrote:City of West University Place, TX has a 30.06 sign on their Rec Center on Bellaire Blvd and West Point St. Wording appears correct, but it is very difficult to read, and photograph, since it is not on a contrasting background.
IMG_1944.JPG
An invalid sign is no more or less invalid because of wrong contrast, letter size, wording etc. It's just plain invalid from the git go. :mrgreen:
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”