30.05 and CHL?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3368
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:36 pm
- Location: Texas City, Texas
Interesting sign
Such a shame that they went through all of that trouble to make a meaningless sign.
It does look like a place I would like to have visited....no chance of that happening now.
Jason
It does look like a place I would like to have visited....no chance of that happening now.
Jason
NRA Life Member
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
Re: 30.05 and CHL?
Just call 'em "cinder dicks" (as in, "detective"). They just love that!StingRay wrote:The Official company title for a Railroad Police Officer is Special Agent...not sure where it comes from but am sure it is somewhere in railroad history. Been working for the railroad for 26 years and haven't thought much about it.stevie_d_64 wrote: They have "special agents"???
Uh oh...
Bet they have shoe phones and everything...
Re: 30.05 and CHL?
That's your choice, of course, but if it's clearly not a legal sign then you're not really "testing" anything. It's the same as if I went into a gas station with a ghostbusters no-gun sign.StingRay wrote:decided I am not going to test it...
Re: 30.05 and CHL?
Except that they have what I believe are their own commissioned peace officers who might view the bosses sign differently and may be inclined to arrest you, whereas the local city PD may not.bburgi wrote:That's your choice, of course, but if it's clearly not a legal sign then you're not really "testing" anything. It's the same as if I went into a gas station with a ghostbusters no-gun sign.
-
- Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:41 am
- Location: Saginaw, TX
Re: 30.05 and CHL?
Also I am not so inclined to lose my job while I fight it.bburgi wrote:That's your choice, of course, but if it's clearly not a legal sign then you're not really "testing" anything. It's the same as if I went into a gas station with a ghostbusters no-gun sign.StingRay wrote:decided I am not going to test it...
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5072
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Looks to Me Like No One Can Enter
Except peace officers...The way the sign is worded it appears that it forbids anyone who is not Peace Officer to enter at all OR carry a handgun. Wow, I wonder how you employees enter without getting arrested by the dreaded railroad police.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Stephenville TX
Re: 30.05 and CHL?
Yeah, they're really special...rode the short bus to the academy and everything.stevie_d_64 wrote:They have "special agents"???StingRay wrote:I think this week I will ask one of the Special Agents what they think of it.
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 5:05 pm
Re: 30.05 and CHL?
don't over look the most improtant part of that exclusion
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section.........
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section.........
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 9:15 pm
Here is an interesting article about RR cops and their powers.
http://www.wweek.com/editorial/3243/7942/
http://www.wweek.com/editorial/3243/7942/
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 7:21 pm
- Location: Red Oak
Re: Looks to Me Like No One Can Enter
You have a valid pointScottDLS wrote:Except peace officers...The way the sign is worded it appears that it forbids anyone who is not Peace Officer to enter at all OR carry a handgun. Wow, I wonder how you employees enter without getting arrested by the dreaded railroad police.
Charlie