Wives question of liability.

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

gigag04
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Wives question of liability.

#16

Post by gigag04 »

RoadRunnerTR21 wrote: You can't fix stupid pretty much sums it up. I'd rather be tried by 12 knowing I took a chance in saving my family rather than place in the ground by 6.
Meaning what exactly in regards to criminal trespass?
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18502
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Wives question of liability.

#17

Post by Keith B »

MamaK wrote:I haven't yet found any case law =/ but I did find these.

http://www.myfoxhouston.com/story/18661 ... z1yHxsVyFn" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
CHL holder fired shot that killed store clerk.

CHl holder killed at COstco
http://www.mynews4.com/news/story/Famil ... qeD8w.cspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Pharmacist Fired For Self Defense SHooting at Walgreens
http://www.gunsandammo.com/2011/09/22/w ... s-robbery/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
These are totally different scenarios, and only the first one was in Texas. The first one did not prohibit the CHL from carrying, but he ended up firing the fatal shot. The second was a patron of the store, but refused to leave initially when asked to and ended up being killed by responding police due to a chain of events that should never have been forged. On the 3rd one, it is strictly a case of employer policy being broken and him being fired, so there is not really a leg to stand on other than he can still stand because he is alive.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4

bdickens
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Wives question of liability.

#18

Post by bdickens »

mewalke wrote:If my poor memory serves me right the Frisco location does have a 30.06 sign posted - but I really had to look for it. I only remember because I had a discussion with my wife that I wouldn't be able to carry in the store once I got my CHL.

It seems rather obvious to me, but if you " really had to look for" the 30.06 sign, then it hardly meets the statutory requirement of being conspicuously posted now does it?
Byron Dickens

texanjoker

Re: Wives question of liability.

#19

Post by texanjoker »

You can sue anybody but that doesn't mean you will win, or even find an attorney to take the case. As in the case #2 in question, they tried federal court. In federal court, the preferred method of a law suit against the police, you receive all lawyer fees paid if you win. Attorneys love it. They obviously withdrew as they didn't have a leg to stand on.

I personally don't see a business being liable for not allowing us to carry. I could see them liable if you get hurt in their store as there is some expectation of safety in a store.

rotor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3326
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: Wives question of liability.

#20

Post by rotor »

The number of chl holders is growing so fast that these stores will suffer financially if they 30-06. I would shop elsewhere for now regardless of the "deal" and the $ sign always influences a business. Money talks.
User avatar

txglock21
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 772
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 11:39 am
Location: Garland, TX.

Re: Wives question of liability.

#21

Post by txglock21 »

Even though I live in DFW area, my only trip to IKEA was in Houston (on vacation). I haven't been to the Frisco one. I don't know if posted at that location, I have no reason to go there or any IKEA's. I'm not trying to "dis" them, but I didn't go in (because of 30:06) and my wife said she was not impressed at all. To each his own.
"Laugh about everything or cry about nothing."
NRA Life Member & TSRA Member/ Former USAF
User avatar

mewalke
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 293
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:39 am
Location: Denton County, TX

Re: Wives question of liability.

#22

Post by mewalke »

bdickens wrote:
mewalke wrote:If my poor memory serves me right the Frisco location does have a 30.06 sign posted - but I really had to look for it. I only remember because I had a discussion with my wife that I wouldn't be able to carry in the store once I got my CHL.

It seems rather obvious to me, but if you " really had to look for" the 30.06 sign, then it hardly meets the statutory requirement of being conspicuously posted now does it?
I wouldn't want to patronize the location regardless if they are following the "conspicuously posted" language. And just because it is obvious to you doesn't mean it would be just as obvious to a prosecutor. If a store has gone through the effort to post 30.06 in any way, and I have an alternative I will not spend my money there.

bdickens
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Wives question of liability.

#23

Post by bdickens »

:txflag: Drive on and do what you think you need to do.
Byron Dickens

EEllis
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1888
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:54 pm

Re: Wives question of liability.

#24

Post by EEllis »

texanjoker wrote:
I personally don't see a business being liable for not allowing us to carry. I could see them liable if you get hurt in their store as there is some expectation of safety in a store.
They aren't liable just because you got hurt. They are liable when some negligence of theirs plays a part in you getting hurt. Now we might see not letting a chl carry as obvious negligence if they don't have some "security" to compensate but, since chls are in the single digit percentage wise even here in Texas, it would be a hard case to get a court to buy.
User avatar

myntalfloss
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:46 pm

Re: Wives question of liability.

#25

Post by myntalfloss »

IKEA posted the 30.06 after numerous people pulled guns on the employees demanding that they be shown the way out of that labrynith.

:anamatedbanana
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Wives question of liability.

#26

Post by jmra »

myntalfloss wrote:IKEA posted the 30.06 after numerous people pulled guns on the employees demanding that they be shown the way out of that labrynith.

:anamatedbanana
"rlol"
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”