Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licenses

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
gthaustex
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1318
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:38 am

Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licenses

#1

Post by gthaustex »

Weird. Imagine that. The Boston bombing suspects did not follow the required laws for firearm use and registration.....

The antis won't see the irony in this and how more checks, registration, etc. won't make a bit of difference. Criminals already don't follow the law.

http://news.yahoo.com/boston-bombing-su ... 48018.html

dpleban
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:39 am
Location: killeen texas

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#2

Post by dpleban »

Criminals will be criminals
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7875
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#3

Post by anygunanywhere »

I find this difficult to believe. What is the world coming to?

Anygunanywhere
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand

mr surveyor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
Location: NE TX

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#4

Post by mr surveyor »

I bet they ordered their guns from the Sears and Roebuck catalogue and got them delivered directly to their house. Oughta be a law against that.
It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#5

Post by VMI77 »

gthaustex wrote:Weird. Imagine that. The Boston bombing suspects did not follow the required laws for firearm use and registration.....

The antis won't see the irony in this and how more checks, registration, etc. won't make a bit of difference. Criminals already don't follow the law.

http://news.yahoo.com/boston-bombing-su ... 48018.html

Won't see the "irony?"....are you kidding, they think "irony" is the metal used to make guns, and they're already attempting to use the not having a license thing to justify more controls:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/ ... HB20130421
But neither brother appears to have been legally entitled to own or carry firearms where they lived, a fact that may add to the national debate over current gun laws. Last week, the U.S. Senate rejected a bill to expand background checks on gun purchases, legislation that opponents argued would do nothing to stop criminals from buying guns illegally
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... z2R9aLSDwS
The news that the suspects were not authorized to own firearms will likely add fuel to calls for tougher gun laws – an issue that was put on the back-burner last week after the Senate blocked the central elements of a gun-control package backed by President Obama.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#6

Post by Jumping Frog »

When they do a firearms trace, how would you like to be the last owner in the chain that they can trace?
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ

ShepherdTX
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:09 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#7

Post by ShepherdTX »

Jumping Frog wrote:When they do a firearms trace, how would you like to be the last owner in the chain that they can trace?
I must confess. I would LOVE it if the guns turned out to be traced back to Fast and Furious.
User avatar

A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#8

Post by A-R »

They likely didn't have explosives permits either.

So what?

:rules:
User avatar

JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#9

Post by JALLEN »

So put 'em in jail for weapons violations, laws already on the books.

Julio and his pals down in the barrio don't give a flip what the Legislature does or thinks, or their silly rules. If they get caught, they get a full ride scholarship to grad school.
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

StewNTexas
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 428
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: Ingleside, TX

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#10

Post by StewNTexas »

Maybe someone can explain it to me, as I just can't get my head around it.

Why is the guy they have in Boston still being called a suspect?

I think I know the reason this was started many years ago, to keep the presumption of innocence going until a trial gets underway, but I still don't understand what is being done in this case.
If the 2nd admendment only applies to muskets and muzzle-loaders, then the 1st admentment must apply only to the spoken or printed word. Printing must be done on hand presses, news stories must be written in longhand, no keyboards or electric processes may be used.
User avatar

A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#11

Post by A-R »

StewNTexas wrote:Maybe someone can explain it to me, as I just can't get my head around it.

Why is the guy they have in Boston still being called a suspect?

I think I know the reason this was started many years ago, to keep the presumption of innocence going until a trial gets underway, but I still don't understand what is being done in this case.
Libel ... can't call him "the bomber" (outside of fair comment doctrine) until he's adjudicated as such (conviction, confession, plea bargain etc ) ... of course, IANAL but I did work in journalism in my younger years.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26851
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#12

Post by The Annoyed Man »

gthaustex wrote:Weird. Imagine that. The Boston bombing suspects did not follow the required laws for firearm use and registration.....

The antis won't see the irony in this and how more checks, registration, etc. won't make a bit of difference. Criminals already don't follow the law.

http://news.yahoo.com/boston-bombing-su ... 48018.html
Well, as long as they didn't transgress any gun-free safety zones......
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

remington79
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 357
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: a little bit of everywhere

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#13

Post by remington79 »

ShepherdTX wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote:When they do a firearms trace, how would you like to be the last owner in the chain that they can trace?
I must confess. I would LOVE it if the guns turned out to be traced back to Fast and Furious.
I posted this on another forum that asked where did they get their guns. I replied with "From the Mexican Cartels who got them courtesy of Eric Holder."
Sent to you from Galt's Gulch.

K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#14

Post by K.Mooneyham »

And this is just another fine example of why I despise the mass media and most of the so-called journalists. The vast bulk of their stories are slanted to one viewpoint, the statist/collectivist viewpoint. They feel the citizenry must be controlled, and its their "job" to convince as much of the citizenry of that as possible. Disgusting.

OldGrumpy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 298
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:37 am
Location: DFW Metroplex

Re: Boston bombing suspects did not have valid handgun licen

#15

Post by OldGrumpy »

mr surveyor wrote:I bet they ordered their guns from the Sears and Roebuck catalogue and got them delivered directly to their house. Oughta be a law against that.
I remember the time when you could order a gun from Sears to be mailed to your home :patriot: :txflag:
Love God, Family, USA, and Texas
Act justly, love mercy, walk humbly with God - Micah 6:8
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”