Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth of

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply

Topic author
BPNovum
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 12:31 am
Location: Houston, Texas USA
Contact:

Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth of

#1

Post by BPNovum »

So, for now, liberty is a little safer. The gun control debate appears to be all but dead at this point and President Obama is once again left with egg on his face after an embarrassing defeat. But was it really a defeat, or merely a distraction?

http://texasgopvote.com/issues/stop-big ... es-0053611" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

mamabearCali
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2214
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:14 pm
Location: Chesterfield, VA

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#2

Post by mamabearCali »

He is pretty angry. I wish he could muster such anger ove American ambassadors being killed or American children being blown to prices, but that is neither here nor there.

The fact remains that he and his consorts got caught with their hand in the bill of rights cookie jar and got their fingers slapped a bit. Now he wants to cry like a spoiled brat to cps that his mommy spanked him. You had your vote Mr. President, now perhaps we can all move onto more pressing matters....oh like the millions out of work and the enormous burden that your healthcare bill has become on the American family.
SAHM to four precious children. Wife to a loving husband.

"The women of this country learned long ago those without swords can still die upon them!" Eowyn in LOTR Two Towers

mr surveyor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
Location: NE TX

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#3

Post by mr surveyor »

mamabearCali wrote:He is pretty angry. I wish he could muster such anger ove American ambassadors being killed or American children being blown to prices, but that is neither here nor there.

The fact remains that he and his consorts got caught with their hand in the bill of rights cookie jar and got their fingers slapped a bit. Now he wants to cry like a spoiled brat to cps that his mommy spanked him. You had your vote Mr. President, now perhaps we can all move onto more pressing matters....oh like the millions out of work and the enormous burden that your healthcare bill has become on the American family.


since we don't have a "Like" or "Thanks" button.....

Thanks, I Like that :cool:
It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!
User avatar

Jaguar
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1332
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 pm
Location: Just west of Cool, Texas

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#4

Post by Jaguar »

mamabearCali wrote:He is pretty angry. I wish he could muster such anger ove American ambassadors being killed or American children being blown to prices, but that is neither here nor there.

The fact remains that he and his consorts got caught with their hand in the bill of rights cookie jar and got their fingers slapped a bit. Now he wants to cry like a spoiled brat to cps that his mommy spanked him. You had your vote Mr. President, now perhaps we can all move onto more pressing matters....oh like the millions out of work and the enormous burden that your healthcare bill has become on the American family.
Thank you, I wanted to post a reply like this earlier but couldn't do it and stay within forum rules. :rules:
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26851
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#5

Post by The Annoyed Man »

BPNovum wrote:So, for now, liberty is a little safer. The gun control debate appears to be all but dead at this point and President Obama is once again left with egg on his face after an embarrassing defeat. But was it really a defeat, or merely a distraction?

http://texasgopvote.com/issues/stop-big ... es-0053611" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I love this picture of DiFi :mrgreen:
Image
mamabearCali wrote:He is pretty angry. I wish he could muster such anger ove American ambassadors being killed or American children being blown to prices, but that is neither here nor there.

The fact remains that he and his consorts got caught with their hand in the bill of rights cookie jar and got their fingers slapped a bit. Now he wants to cry like a spoiled brat to cps that his mommy spanked him. You had your vote Mr. President, now perhaps we can all move onto more pressing matters....oh like the millions out of work and the enormous burden that your healthcare bill has become on the American family.
I don't really care if he's angry. I hope he's good and angry and loses sleep over it. Then he'll know just a little of how I've felt since his first inauguration. Big deal. One of his megalomaniacal attempts to "transform" the country has failed........when all the others have succeeded "spectacularly." He's a cry-baby. And he dove into the gun-control thing because (has anyone noticed) as long as he kept hammering on that, the press gave him a big fat pass on the economy, jobs, taxes, and they stopped talking about HIS sequestration.......after they had FINALLY started talking about it. Now that the gun bills are for the most part behind us, the press is going to start debating his job performance failures in all those other areas....or at least some of them will.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

powerboatr
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2275
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:53 pm
Location: North East Texas

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#6

Post by powerboatr »

thats is great news
I emailed ted last night about dummies voting for things with no words or even for shame....never reading it
Proud to have served for over 22 Years in the U.S. Navy Certificated FAA A&P technician since 1996

Rrash
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 483
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 1:25 am
Location: McKinney

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#7

Post by Rrash »

Just remember to let them be the ones that look bad. We don't need to be sore winners.
User avatar

JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#8

Post by JALLEN »

Don't go to sleep. This is just the latest salvo. They'll be back.

If somehow we could get 60 votes in the Senate, they would have to wait before they could come back.

DiFi suffers from PTDS-like derangement from having been first on the scene of the Milk and Mosconi shootings that made her Mayor of San Francisco. I believe I read that she reached to see if one of them had a pulse and poked her finger through a bullet hole in the wrist or something like that.

She was just re-elected and will be 80 in a month or so. She has said if she had the votes she would pick up every gun in America. For the next 5 years, this will be her windmill to tilt at.
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

SlickTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 331
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: Coppell, TX

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#9

Post by SlickTX »

mamabearCali wrote:He is pretty angry. I wish he could muster such anger ove American ambassadors being killed or American children being blown to prices, but that is neither here nor there.
Hopefully he will pivot to the REAL problem out there. Pressure cookers.

We need to make sure that all pressure cookers are bought through a federally licensed appliance dealer with a complete background check. The cooking show loophole must be closed, no more private sales of pressure cookers without a background check. We also need to address high-capacity pressure cookers that can carry more than 10 ball bearings.

[/sarcasm off]

With all the focus on the implement of death in the gun debate, the pressure cooker debate must be next. No?
[Insert pithy witicism here]

Proudly carrying since 09/10.
User avatar

Wodathunkit
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 895
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 11:18 am
Location: Friendswood, Texas

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#10

Post by Wodathunkit »

SlickTX wrote:
mamabearCali wrote:He is pretty angry. I wish he could muster such anger ove American ambassadors being killed or American children being blown to prices, but that is neither here nor there.
Hopefully he will pivot to the REAL problem out there. Pressure cookers.

We need to make sure that all pressure cookers are bought through a federally licensed appliance dealer with a complete background check. The cooking show loophole must be closed, no more private sales of pressure cookers without a background check. We also need to address high-capacity pressure cookers that can carry more than 10 ball bearings.

[/sarcasm off]

With all the focus on the implement of death in the gun debate, the pressure cooker debate must be next. No?
I'm an avid pressure cooker user with my garden harvest, if I have to go through an FFL to get a new gasket for my 8qt I'm gonna blame you! :evil2:
"Character is doing the right thing, even when nobody is looking" - J.C. watts Jr.
CHL since Jan. 2013
53 days mailbox to mailbox.
User avatar

JJVP
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: League City, TX

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#11

Post by JJVP »

Wodathunkit wrote:
SlickTX wrote:
mamabearCali wrote:He is pretty angry. I wish he could muster such anger ove American ambassadors being killed or American children being blown to prices, but that is neither here nor there.
Hopefully he will pivot to the REAL problem out there. Pressure cookers.

We need to make sure that all pressure cookers are bought through a federally licensed appliance dealer with a complete background check. The cooking show loophole must be closed, no more private sales of pressure cookers without a background check. We also need to address high-capacity pressure cookers that can carry more than 10 ball bearings.

[/sarcasm off]

With all the focus on the implement of death in the gun debate, the pressure cooker debate must be next. No?
I'm an avid pressure cooker user with my garden harvest, if I have to go through an FFL to get a new gasket for my 8qt I'm gonna blame you! :evil2:
Is for the children. If we can save one life it is worth it. We have to do something. We are not trying to take your pressure cookers. Just common sense regulations. "rlol"
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.

lrpettit
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:33 pm
Location: Plano/Dallas

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#12

Post by lrpettit »

I think his game plan all along was to get "ammunition" for 2014 so he can say that Republicans are unwilling to make changes necessary to protect our schools. A battle may have been won but it's going to be a fierce war leading up to 2014.
Opinions are my own, commonly worthless, and should not be relied upon. I am not a lawyer.
LTC Holder

K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#13

Post by K.Mooneyham »

lrpettit wrote:I think his game plan all along was to get "ammunition" for 2014 so he can say that Republicans are unwilling to make changes necessary to protect our schools. A battle may have been won but it's going to be a fierce war leading up to 2014.
That indeed may be true...but I saw the analysis of which Senators are up for re-election...and the only slam-dunk the Democrat Party has is the seat in Maine...whose Senator voted for this stuff anyway. Yeah, I don't like losing that seat, but I do hope that maybe the Democrats will lose more than they gain on this one.

lrpettit
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 9:33 pm
Location: Plano/Dallas

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#14

Post by lrpettit »

K.Mooneyham wrote:
lrpettit wrote:I think his game plan all along was to get "ammunition" for 2014 so he can say that Republicans are unwilling to make changes necessary to protect our schools. A battle may have been won but it's going to be a fierce war leading up to 2014.
That indeed may be true...but I saw the analysis of which Senators are up for re-election...and the only slam-dunk the Democrat Party has is the seat in Maine...whose Senator voted for this stuff anyway. Yeah, I don't like losing that seat, but I do hope that maybe the Democrats will lose more than they gain on this one.
Personally, I'm far more worried about losing control of the House. If the Democrats chose to, they could already go "nuclear" in the senate.
Opinions are my own, commonly worthless, and should not be relied upon. I am not a lawyer.
LTC Holder

K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: Expanded Background Checks Fail in the Senate - The Myth

#15

Post by K.Mooneyham »

lrpettit wrote:
K.Mooneyham wrote:
lrpettit wrote:I think his game plan all along was to get "ammunition" for 2014 so he can say that Republicans are unwilling to make changes necessary to protect our schools. A battle may have been won but it's going to be a fierce war leading up to 2014.
That indeed may be true...but I saw the analysis of which Senators are up for re-election...and the only slam-dunk the Democrat Party has is the seat in Maine...whose Senator voted for this stuff anyway. Yeah, I don't like losing that seat, but I do hope that maybe the Democrats will lose more than they gain on this one.
Personally, I'm far more worried about losing control of the House. If the Democrats chose to, they could already go "nuclear" in the senate.
The bill never even came up to a vote in the House...if the Republican Party loses the House, it won't be because of gun control.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”