He probably just missed it for a week. He has answered far more important posts yesterday.AEA wrote:Texas Sheepdog.......did you miss this request above?longtooth wrote:Welcome tothe forum Texas Sheepdog. With 4 post you have definately made a 1st impression.
With me too.
Do you mind sharing your location & agency of your avitar?
At least the County of your jurisdiction.???
Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering CHLer
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 12329
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Angelina County
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
- Location: Allen, TX
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
So your policy stands in direct violation of the law?Texas Sheepdog wrote:Our policy says to disarm everyone. If the gun comes back clean and we can verify their credentials, they get the gun back unloaded, and they can reload after they leave the scene. If there's any questions, we can hold onto the gun until we sort things out. Sometimes we hold onto the suspect too, depending on the contact. LOL
The law says that an officer may disarm a CHL holder if that officer reasonably believes it is necessary for safety, that puts the onus on the officer, not department policy.
Sounds like it's time for an Attorney General decision to stop the rampant abuse of the law by departments using "policy" instead of the reasonable belief of the officer on the scene.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
It's not real safe IMO to be loading and unloading a gun on a city street (if that's where he works).jimlongley wrote:So your policy stands in direct violation of the law?Texas Sheepdog wrote:Our policy says to disarm everyone. If the gun comes back clean and we can verify their credentials, they get the gun back unloaded, and they can reload after they leave the scene. If there's any questions, we can hold onto the gun until we sort things out. Sometimes we hold onto the suspect too, depending on the contact. LOL
The law says that an officer may disarm a CHL holder if that officer reasonably believes it is necessary for safety, that puts the onus on the officer, not department policy.
Sounds like it's time for an Attorney General decision to stop the rampant abuse of the law by departments using "policy" instead of the reasonable belief of the officer on the scene.
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
That really sounds like disrespect for people with a CHL to me.jimlongley wrote:Texas Sheepdog wrote:Our policy says to disarm everyone. If the gun comes back clean and we can verify their credentials, they get the gun back unloaded, and they can reload after they leave the scene. If there's any questions, we can hold onto the gun until we sort things out. Sometimes we hold onto the suspect too, depending on the contact. LOL
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 9
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
- Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
More like intimidation and bullying to me.MeMelYup wrote:That really sounds like disrespect for people with a CHL to me.jimlongley wrote:Texas Sheepdog wrote:Our policy says to disarm everyone. If the gun comes back clean and we can verify their credentials, they get the gun back unloaded, and they can reload after they leave the scene. If there's any questions, we can hold onto the gun until we sort things out. Sometimes we hold onto the suspect too, depending on the contact. LOL
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
I personally do not believe every CHL holder needs to be disarmed. In addition I would be curious to read their policy if it existed.mojo84 wrote:More like intimidation and bullying to me.MeMelYup wrote:That really sounds like disrespect for people with a CHL to me.jimlongley wrote:Texas Sheepdog wrote:Our policy says to disarm everyone. If the gun comes back clean and we can verify their credentials, they get the gun back unloaded, and they can reload after they leave the scene. If there's any questions, we can hold onto the gun until we sort things out. Sometimes we hold onto the suspect too, depending on the contact. LOL
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
- Location: Northern Colorado
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
$1 to a donut this is his personal policy. If this was his department's policy, there would be no problem sharing the PD's name / location so CHLers would know, and avoid, such an area. I'm guessing we won't ever hear which PD it is...
Unless the mods want to pull his / her IP address and do a reverse lookup on it.
Unless the mods want to pull his / her IP address and do a reverse lookup on it.
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
If he is a leo he may fall under the social media policies. Many agencies now have social media policies that actually prohibit one from saying where they work while visiting social websites online. With that you have to remain anonymous. But then if that is a real photo on the avatar in uniform showing a company car I would guess they don't have that policy.pbwalker wrote:$1 to a donut this is his personal policy. If this was his department's policy, there would be no problem sharing the PD's name / location so CHLers would know, and avoid, such an area. I'm guessing we won't ever hear which PD it is...
Unless the mods want to pull his / her IP address and do a reverse lookup on it.
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
I'm thinking the word "imposter"...
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
- Location: Ellis County
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
The social media policy is a smart move on the part of PDs, especially if they are advising their officers to participate in illegal activities such as disarming a CHL even when there is no perceived threat.texanjoker wrote:If he is a leo he may fall under the social media policies. Many agencies now have social media policies that actually prohibit one from saying where they work while visiting social websites online. With that you have to remain anonymous. But then if that is a real photo on the avatar in uniform showing a company car I would guess they don't have that policy.pbwalker wrote:$1 to a donut this is his personal policy. If this was his department's policy, there would be no problem sharing the PD's name / location so CHLers would know, and avoid, such an area. I'm guessing we won't ever hear which PD it is...
Unless the mods want to pull his / her IP address and do a reverse lookup on it.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 7875
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: Richmond, Texas
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
Still no response LT??longtooth wrote:
He probably just missed it for a week. He has answered far more important posts yesterday.
Anygunanywhere
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
I think TS has been unmasked - but, he had us going for awhile...
My guess: he'll reappear under another name.
Maybe then, I won't be as gullible...
My guess: he'll reappear under another name.
Maybe then, I won't be as gullible...
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 7
- Posts: 5110
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
- Location: North Texas
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
That's probably a accurate thought.Abraham wrote:I'm thinking the word "imposter"...
Or.......he could be in the Hospital recovering from disarming a CHL and shooting himself in the leg while trying to run the numbers.
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
AEA wrote:That's probably a accurate thought.Abraham wrote:I'm thinking the word "imposter"...
Or.......he could be in the Hospital recovering from disarming a CHL and shooting himself in the leg while trying to run the numbers.
Good one..
Nice puppy in your profile. I have two GS myself.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 12329
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Angelina County
Re: Response From DPS Regarding Policies When Encountering C
Nope & my comment about more important posts was sarcasim. That is about as close to a joke as I ever tell on acount I kant tellem.anygunanywhere wrote:Still no response LT??longtooth wrote:
He probably just missed it for a week. He has answered far more important posts yesterday.
Anygunanywhere
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11