Well Here We Go
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 9
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:11 pm
- Location: Parker County
Re: Well Here We Go
Linked from Hot Air
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/14/s ... er-mother/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Update (AP): CNN backs up Fox’s report that the guns were legally purchased by Lanza’s mother, and claims that the rifle was found in the trunk of a car parked at the school. Did he only use the two pistols during his attack, or did he have the rifle out at some point before returning it to the car? And if he didn’t have it out, why not? Seems like, if you’re of a mind to commit a mass shooting, you’d want to use the biggest weapon you have.
Update (AP): I’m clicking around on Connecticut’s judicial website of gun regulations to see how many violations this guy is probably guilty of under current law. After a cursory five-minute search, I’ve got at least 10. One: Assuming mom didn’t lend him the two pistols and rifle, he’s guilty of three counts of theft. Two: He’s guilty of three counts of possessing a weapon on school grounds. Three: He may be guilty of three counts of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver. Lanza reportedly had a “checkered past” and had been a “troubled youth for most of his life.” We don’t know how checkered because his juvenile records are sealed, but if he was “convicted as delinquent for the commission of a serious juvenile offense” then that’s two more violations, one for possessing each pistol. Four: Per NBC, concealed-carry permits aren’t granted to anyone in Connecticut under the age of 21. That means two more violations for the 20-year-old Lanza for carrying the two pistols. (You don’t need a permit to carry a rifle.) Oh, and if Wikipedia is accurate, Connecticut police are fully entitled to seize weapons in someone’s possession without a warrant if they have probable cause that the suspect is mentally unstable or likely to commit a crime. Go surf around on the gun-laws site and see what else you find. There’s probably stuff I missed.
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/14/s ... er-mother/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Update (AP): CNN backs up Fox’s report that the guns were legally purchased by Lanza’s mother, and claims that the rifle was found in the trunk of a car parked at the school. Did he only use the two pistols during his attack, or did he have the rifle out at some point before returning it to the car? And if he didn’t have it out, why not? Seems like, if you’re of a mind to commit a mass shooting, you’d want to use the biggest weapon you have.
Update (AP): I’m clicking around on Connecticut’s judicial website of gun regulations to see how many violations this guy is probably guilty of under current law. After a cursory five-minute search, I’ve got at least 10. One: Assuming mom didn’t lend him the two pistols and rifle, he’s guilty of three counts of theft. Two: He’s guilty of three counts of possessing a weapon on school grounds. Three: He may be guilty of three counts of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver. Lanza reportedly had a “checkered past” and had been a “troubled youth for most of his life.” We don’t know how checkered because his juvenile records are sealed, but if he was “convicted as delinquent for the commission of a serious juvenile offense” then that’s two more violations, one for possessing each pistol. Four: Per NBC, concealed-carry permits aren’t granted to anyone in Connecticut under the age of 21. That means two more violations for the 20-year-old Lanza for carrying the two pistols. (You don’t need a permit to carry a rifle.) Oh, and if Wikipedia is accurate, Connecticut police are fully entitled to seize weapons in someone’s possession without a warrant if they have probable cause that the suspect is mentally unstable or likely to commit a crime. Go surf around on the gun-laws site and see what else you find. There’s probably stuff I missed.
Last edited by Poldark on Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Term Limits, Please.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:01 pm
- Location: Cedar Park / Austin
Re: Well Here We Go
armed faculty members would be meaningful. Mentally ill. nonetheless, that was pure evil.Bennies wrote:From the president....."...meaningful action regardless of politics....". In other words release the dogs and push our gun control agenda hard. You can bet this unspeakable tradgedy will be used hard against the second amendment. Buckle up.
Last edited by handog on Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 9
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:11 pm
- Location: Parker County
Re: Well Here We Go
Interesting post relating to the HIPAA laws
Here’s the other thing…. HIPAA laws.
Here’s the other thing…. HIPAA laws.
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/14/s ... er-mother/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;If this shooter was in the mental health system and did not want his mother to know he had been suicidal or was making threats… because of HIPAA..no one in the agency could tell the parents. Even if he was living with them. Now.. I do not know the HIPAA laws in that state. There is a national HIPAA law and each states have their own. And as I understand it.. the state laws superposed the federal laws on this.
But in my state when I was a caseworker… if my client didn’t want me to communicate anything to a parent. I couldn’t. Period. Unless that client specifically said “I am going to kill my mother on this date at this time with this gun I have right here” We had no duty to inform. And if he said it and changed his mind 5 minutes later saying he wouldn’t do it… I could not, under direction by our agency, inform.
Now.. if he had made vague threats… “I want to kill someone. I have mom and dad.” Under my agency..we still.. under our state law.. could not inform that parent.
If the client just kept repeating vague feelings of wanting to kill someone… and mom and dad called one day to see how he was doing. All I could say was “He’s doing fine.” Under the law. That was it. anything more was a Civil Rights violation with a huge 5 figure fine.
So mom and dad.. depending on the mental health agency this shooter was involved with.. may have only ever been told “He’s doing fine.” when in fact.. he has been spewing repeatedly how he wants to kill people.
This is why the libs want us to look at the gun! If we look at the gun.. we won’t look at all the other things that have influenced this shooter and is influencing the culture. Failed Psychiatry. Failed Therapy. The failed education system. Taking god out of schools. Abortion. Just to name a few.
JellyToast on December 14, 2012 at 7:59 PM
Term Limits, Please.
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:15 pm
- Location: Collin County
Re: Well Here We Go
Poldark wrote:http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2 ... -shooting/
4:52 p.m: Ryan Lanza, 24, brother of gunman Adam Lanza, 20, tells authorities that his younger brother is autistic, or has Asperger syndrome and a “personality disorder.” Neighbors described the younger man to ABC as “odd” and displaying characteristics associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Assuming the reports that these were the suspect's mother's guns are correct..... I think if I had a son who was a "half bubble off level", who had juvenile behavior problems, I would have my guns in the best safe money can buy.
Aspergers is a very scary disorder. Not always easily detectable, and often not diagnosed or misdiagnosed.
I just refuse to believe that there weren't warning signs. A close family member is a LEO in Denver, where there have been two of these in the last 15 years, and his indication is that there are red flags all over the place with these whackos. Unfortunately their families are often in denial, or afraid to raise awareness.
Re: Well Here We Go
Now says he had no criminal record...
I can easily see this being used against CHL/CCW holders saying we could snap at any moment guns blazing.
I can easily see this being used against CHL/CCW holders saying we could snap at any moment guns blazing.
With all this "gun control" talk,
I haven't heard one politician say how they plan to take gun from criminals,
just law abiding citizens.
I haven't heard one politician say how they plan to take gun from criminals,
just law abiding citizens.
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 9
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:11 pm
- Location: Parker County
Re: Well Here We Go
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/14/s ... er-mother/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Update (AP): Mary Katharine e-mails with thoughts:
From earlier, in the second presser, Lt. Vance said two handguns were found w the body and the rifle in the car.
A couple points. If you were of a mind to go into a school w guns concealed somehow–as he might have, considering this started apparently w an altercation in the office instead of going straight to the classroom–you’d likely wanna just carry the two handguns. The rifle would limit mobility and couldn’t be concealed and the handguns would give you plenty of rounds and portability.
Also of interest, if the mom’s rifle was indeed legally purchased, that means it’s NOT an “assault weapon” unless she had it purchased and registered pre-1993. CT bans “assault weapons,” so both that fact and the fact hers likely wasn’t one makes the call for Assault Weapons Ban reinstatement pretty tendentious, right?
Maybe a Ruger Mini 14 ?
Update (AP): Mary Katharine e-mails with thoughts:
From earlier, in the second presser, Lt. Vance said two handguns were found w the body and the rifle in the car.
A couple points. If you were of a mind to go into a school w guns concealed somehow–as he might have, considering this started apparently w an altercation in the office instead of going straight to the classroom–you’d likely wanna just carry the two handguns. The rifle would limit mobility and couldn’t be concealed and the handguns would give you plenty of rounds and portability.
Also of interest, if the mom’s rifle was indeed legally purchased, that means it’s NOT an “assault weapon” unless she had it purchased and registered pre-1993. CT bans “assault weapons,” so both that fact and the fact hers likely wasn’t one makes the call for Assault Weapons Ban reinstatement pretty tendentious, right?
Maybe a Ruger Mini 14 ?
Term Limits, Please.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
- Location: N Houston
Re: Well Here We Go
1) stole his mothers guns
2) possessed hand guns under age of 21
3) went onto school property with guns
4) killed someone
5) killed someone
6) killed someone
7) killed someone
8) killed someone
9) killed someone
10) killed someone
11) killed someone
12) killed someone
13)killed someone
14) killed someone
15) killed someone
16) killed someone
17) killed someone
18) killed someone
19) killed someone
20) killed someone
21) killed someone
22) killed someone
23) killed someone
24) killed someone
25) killed someone
26) killed someone
27) killed someone
28) killed someone
29) killed someone
dont think he's really interested in following laws
2) possessed hand guns under age of 21
3) went onto school property with guns
4) killed someone
5) killed someone
6) killed someone
7) killed someone
8) killed someone
9) killed someone
10) killed someone
11) killed someone
12) killed someone
13)killed someone
14) killed someone
15) killed someone
16) killed someone
17) killed someone
18) killed someone
19) killed someone
20) killed someone
21) killed someone
22) killed someone
23) killed someone
24) killed someone
25) killed someone
26) killed someone
27) killed someone
28) killed someone
29) killed someone
dont think he's really interested in following laws
NRA Lifetime Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3058
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
- Location: Converse, TX
Re: Well Here We Go
Kathy Jackson (The Cornered Cat) summarized it so well:
"I will not name the murderer. I will not link to his scribblings or post his picture. I will not contribute to the sick cult of celebrity that drives copycats after events like this."
http://www.corneredcat.com/tears-and-pr ... /#comments" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"I will not name the murderer. I will not link to his scribblings or post his picture. I will not contribute to the sick cult of celebrity that drives copycats after events like this."
http://www.corneredcat.com/tears-and-pr ... /#comments" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
- Location: NE TX
Re: Well Here We Go
we need Soul Control in America!
It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:07 pm
Re: Well Here We Go
[youtube][/youtube]
Get ready people... a total gun ban is what the liberals want. They will install an Assault Weapons Ban that will include a ban on high capacity magazines... and I fear they will NOT grandfather the guns that are already out there. You say it can not happen? Look what they did with Obamacare... they do not care and they will force this issue now.
Get ready people... a total gun ban is what the liberals want. They will install an Assault Weapons Ban that will include a ban on high capacity magazines... and I fear they will NOT grandfather the guns that are already out there. You say it can not happen? Look what they did with Obamacare... they do not care and they will force this issue now.
“If you try to shoot me, I will have to shoot you back, and I promise you I won’t miss!”
NRA Endowment Member
TSRA Member
NRA Endowment Member
TSRA Member
Re: Well Here We Go
Piers Morgan needs to take himself back to the UK. He's a Euro-windbag...and a mouthpiece, nothing more.
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 9
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:11 pm
- Location: Parker County
Re: Well Here We Go
Heartland Patriot wrote:Piers Morgan needs to take himself back to the UK. He's a Euro-windbag...and a mouthpiece, nothing more.
Term Limits, Please.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 2093
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:34 pm
- Location: League City, TX
Re: Well Here We Go
No 2 is not illegal. Eighteen to twenty year olds cannot buy a handgun from an FFL, but they can posses and own handguns.APynckel wrote:1) stole his mothers guns
2) possessed hand guns under age of 21
3) went onto school property with guns
4) killed someone
5) killed someone
6) killed someone
7) killed someone
8) killed someone
9) killed someone
10) killed someone
11) killed someone
12) killed someone
13)killed someone
14) killed someone
15) killed someone
16) killed someone
17) killed someone
18) killed someone
19) killed someone
20) killed someone
21) killed someone
22) killed someone
23) killed someone
24) killed someone
25) killed someone
26) killed someone
27) killed someone
28) killed someone
29) killed someone
dont think he's really interested in following laws
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 5488
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
- Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)
Re: Well Here We Go
It is legal in Texas, but that is completely dependent on state law.JJVP wrote:No 2 is not illegal. Eighteen to twenty year olds cannot buy a handgun from an FFL, but they can posses and own handguns.APynckel wrote:....
2) possessed hand guns under age of 21
....
You must be 21 or older to possess a handgun in CT and many other states.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 2315
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Well Here We Go
I'm not sure they would want him back after the cell phone hacking and whatnot.Heartland Patriot wrote:Piers Morgan needs to take himself back to the UK. He's a Euro-windbag...and a mouthpiece, nothing more.
I Thess 5:21
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut