Like this?stevie_d_64 wrote:anygunanywhere wrote:"Random Bulges"???
"Just for Men"???
You may garner more attention than what its worth...
And that leads to alllll sorts of other problems I figure...
:D
Moderators: carlson1, Crossfire
Like this?stevie_d_64 wrote:anygunanywhere wrote:"Random Bulges"???
"Just for Men"???
You may garner more attention than what its worth...
And that leads to alllll sorts of other problems I figure...
Now I've seen everything.KBCraig wrote:stevie_d_64 wrote:Like this?anygunanywhere wrote:"Random Bulges"???
"Just for Men"???
You may garner more attention than what its worth...
And that leads to alllll sorts of other problems I figure...
:D
I went to put on one of my cross-hatched Colombia shirts today and discovered that they are "Magellan". I apologize for the fashion faux paux. Arock knows his clothes. My lovely wife dresses me and buys my clothes.Arock wrote:Negative Ghost Rider the pattern is full. Those Columbia fishing shirts are a dead give-aways. Solid color. Solid colors show every bulge.
Thats interesting...KBCraig wrote:stevie_d_64 wrote:Like this?anygunanywhere wrote:"Random Bulges"???
"Just for Men"???
You may garner more attention than what its worth...
And that leads to alllll sorts of other problems I figure...
:D
I have a gay acquaintence who is an avid shooter, and I would much rather sit with that person and shoot the breeze about almost anything than someone who is rabidly anti-gun. I found out long ago that it doesn't rub off.stevie_d_64 wrote: If I had a choice, my interaction with people of that orientation (regardless that I believe it is an immoral activity), I would rather hangout and shoot the breeze, with gay men and women who believe as I do about personal freedom and self-defense???...Than the alternative who do not (regardless of their sexual orientation)...Which would not happen anyway...
Sexual orientation, to me, is not an issue when it comes to valuing, promoting and defending those rights as a citizen of this country...
Still...It is amazing there are small "organized" and promoted pockets of folks like this...
I don't know your age or appearance, but I'll testify that you can modify your "style" without so much as a ripple.da.suxor wrote:I must say, at my age, and my apperance, wearing a hawian shirt or fishing shirt would scream that I am up to something.
Dangit! Somebody lied to me when they said they broke the mold after me...KBCraig wrote:I don't know your age or appearance, but I'll testify that you can modify your "style" without so much as a ripple.da.suxor wrote:I must say, at my age, and my apperance, wearing a hawian shirt or fishing shirt would scream that I am up to something.
I'm 42, short brown (2/3 gray) hair that's thinning in back, and a goatee. I'm 5'10", trying to stay on the downside of 230 pounds, but with broad shoulders (I don't look that heavy). I've always stuck with the style of my age, meaning early-mid '80s, jeans or dockers and polos or button-down oxfords (tucked, of course). It's a mild style that wears well in any era, and I hate spending money on new clothes.
When I started carrying full time, I realized that my wardrobe was unrealistic, especially since I carry a full-size pistol (Ruger P97). The first thing I had to get realistic about was my pants size. I started out carrying IWB, so I actually went up two waist sizes, and switched to a looser cut.
Next, I looked around and saw that lots of people wear shirts that make perfect cover garments. After spending less than $60, I had several sets of club-style shirts with matching Ts.
Now instead of a middle-age, balding, graying, overweight father of five, I look like a middle-age, balding, graying, overweight father of five with cool clothes.
This is all casual wear, mind you. I can't carry at (or even to) work. For nicer occasions, I wear a suit or slacks and blazer, and the same carry rigs work just fine.
Kevin