BAD EXPERIENCE: Dallas Museum of Art

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

age_ranger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:11 pm
Location: Plano, Tx

#106

Post by age_ranger »

What would happen if you refused to be searched? Do they deny you entrance? If so, on what grounds? Do you have to consent to search to gain admittance?


Cross that place off my list of places to visit.
http://www.berettaforum.net" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Just remember: Your very best thinking got you where you are now!!!

JohnKSa
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 2:23 am
Location: DFW Area

Clarification on a comment I made way back on page (3?)

#107

Post by JohnKSa »

If I rent or lease a building on govt. property for the purpose of a business, does the law actually prevent me from posting a 30-06 sign that carries the weight of law?

My understanding to now has been that the business owner has the right to post the sign regardless of who actually owns the building as long as he has leased or rented rights to the building. Are we really saying that is not the case? That a person renting a building from the govt. can not post the sign?
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
User avatar

Liberty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Re: Clarification on a comment I made way back on page (3?)

#108

Post by Liberty »

JohnKSa wrote:If I rent or lease a building on govt. property for the purpose of a business, does the law actually prevent me from posting a 30-06 sign that carries the weight of law?

My understanding to now has been that the business owner has the right to post the sign regardless of who actually owns the building as long as he has leased or rented rights to the building. Are we really saying that is not the case? That a person renting a building from the govt. can not post the sign?
The sign has no bearing if it is on city owned property. If there is a sign there you have a defense for carrying a concealed handgun if you have a CHL. You can legally carry even if there is a sign.

They can also post a sign that says "No Dumb People Allowed". That sign is also meaningless. But there is nothing stopping the leasee from putting up any sign they want.

kauboy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 19
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:15 pm
Location: Burleson, Lone Star State (of course)

Re: Clarification on a comment I made way back on page (3?)

#109

Post by kauboy »

Liberty wrote:
JohnKSa wrote:If I rent or lease a building on govt. property for the purpose of a business, does the law actually prevent me from posting a 30-06 sign that carries the weight of law?

My understanding to now has been that the business owner has the right to post the sign regardless of who actually owns the building as long as he has leased or rented rights to the building. Are we really saying that is not the case? That a person renting a building from the govt. can not post the sign?
The sign has no bearing if it is on city owned property. If there is a sign there you have a defense for carrying a concealed handgun if you have a CHL. You can legally carry even if there is a sign.

They can also post a sign that says "No Dumb People Allowed". That sign is also meaningless. But there is nothing stopping the leasee from putting up any sign they want.
We'll see if thats true. Everybody just wait for the "official" word. You all know its coming. :razz:
"People should not be afraid of their Governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people." - V

lcarreau
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:28 am
Location: Arlington, TX

#110

Post by lcarreau »

The Dallas Museum is posted.

Image
User avatar

Topic author
nitrogen
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 2322
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Sachse, TX
Contact:

#111

Post by nitrogen »

I don' t think it's a legal sign. it's not contrasting, and I don't believe the letters are large enough. (I can't tell from the photo)

When was this taken? I didn't see this when I went.
.השואה... לעולם לא עוד
Holocaust... Never Again.
Some people create their own storms and get upset when it rains.
--anonymous

casselthief
Banned
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 632
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:05 pm
Location: yes, I have one.

#112

Post by casselthief »

more importantly, what're you doing wearing shorts and sandals in this weather?!?!?!?!!

I think you're trying to get a little technical on the validity of the sign it's self. I think white on a dark background is contrasting.
good luck on winning that fight. ;-)

lcarreau
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:28 am
Location: Arlington, TX

#113

Post by lcarreau »

nitrogen wrote:I don' t think it's a legal sign. it's not contrasting, and I don't believe the letters are large enough. (I can't tell from the photo)

When was this taken? I didn't see this when I went.
Not sure what day, but it was the week after Thanksgiving. My wanted to see that darn Van Gogh thing also. The letters were probably the right height, but the sign was in the lower right corner of the north entrance. I was caught off guard and had to go back to the car to drop off Colt Defender I was carrying.

-Lonnie

lcarreau
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:28 am
Location: Arlington, TX

#114

Post by lcarreau »

casselthief wrote:more importantly, what're you doing wearing shorts and sandals in this weather?!?!?!?!!

I think you're trying to get a little technical on the validity of the sign it's self. I think white on a dark background is contrasting.
good luck on winning that fight. ;-)
It was a warm day.

kauboy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 19
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:15 pm
Location: Burleson, Lone Star State (of course)

#115

Post by kauboy »

casselthief wrote:I think you're trying to get a little technical on the validity of the sign it's self. I think white on a dark background is contrasting.
good luck on winning that fight. ;-)
Contrasting nothing!!! I'm pretty sure clear glass is not a contrasting color.
Anyways, were the other entrances posted? Well, first I should ask if there are other entrances. :lol:
"People should not be afraid of their Governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people." - V

lcarreau
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:28 am
Location: Arlington, TX

#116

Post by lcarreau »

kauboy wrote:
casselthief wrote:I think you're trying to get a little technical on the validity of the sign it's self. I think white on a dark background is contrasting.
good luck on winning that fight. ;-)
Contrasting nothing!!! I'm pretty sure clear glass is not a contrasting color.
Anyways, were the other entrances posted? Well, first I should ask if there are other entrances. :lol:
All the other 30.06 signs have seen have been the white stenciled letters on glass. In my mind, this served as legal noticed and I complied. There probably are other entrances, but if you pay to park in their parking garage, you would almost certainly use the north entrance, which is where I took the picture.

-Lonnie

Braden
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:43 am
Location: Texas

#117

Post by Braden »

I'd consider that to be a legal sign...unless of course the city owns the building.
"I can do all things through Him who strengthens me." - Philippians 4:13

kauboy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 19
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:15 pm
Location: Burleson, Lone Star State (of course)

#118

Post by kauboy »

Negative!
Penal code states:
a sign posted on the property that:
(i) includes the language described by
Paragraph (A) in both English and Spanish;
(ii) appears in contrasting colors with
block letters at least one inch in height; and
(iii) is displayed in a conspicuous manner
clearly visible to the public.


Letter (ii) says they must be block letters and they ALL must be 1" in height. Regardless of whether you think it's contrasting, it still doesn't meet this req.
Also, letter (iii) says that it must be displayed in a "conspicuous manner". That means that it must "attract special attention, as by outstanding qualities or eccentricities" to comply. Does this sign? No.

My opinion: Good try, but not legal.
If they don't wand, I carry.
Last edited by kauboy on Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:02 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"People should not be afraid of their Governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people." - V

lcarreau
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 11:28 am
Location: Arlington, TX

#119

Post by lcarreau »

kauboy wrote:Negative!
Penal code states:
a sign posted on the property that:
(i) includes the language described by
Paragraph (A) in both English and Spanish;
(ii) appears in contrasting colors with
block letters at least one inch in height; and
(iii) is displayed in a conspicuous manner
clearly visible to the public.


Letter (ii) says they must be block letters and they ALL must be 1" in height. Regardless of whether you think it's contrasting, it still doesn't meet this req.
Also, letter (iii) says that it must be displayed in a "conspicuous manner". That means that it muse "attract special attention, as by outstanding qualities or eccentricities" to comply. Does this sign? No.

My opinion: Not legal.
I believe the letter size requirement is meant. How are they not block letters? The sign was at the main entrance on the front door. It was just not at eye level. It was also only on one door, but there were several other doors.

-Lonnie

kauboy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 19
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:15 pm
Location: Burleson, Lone Star State (of course)

#120

Post by kauboy »

lcarreau wrote:How are they not block letters?
Block letters are all capitalized and all the same height (same width too, I think). The museum tried to use some fancy script to keep it appealing. The law is specific. It may look ugly in the end, but if you wish to restrict, that's what you have to deal with.

EDIT: The Texas DPS has a very good example of what the sign must look like. Apart from the size, which will differ based on the resolution of the screen it is viewed on, this is the proper signage: Proper 30.06 signage
Notice the block letters?
"People should not be afraid of their Governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people." - V
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”