Would you have been willing to pay more for faster service?

So, your CHL Application has been filed and the clock has slowed to a crawl - tell us about it!

Moderator: carlson1


Topic author
bugsbunny45
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:22 pm

Would you have been willing to pay more for faster service?

#1

Post by bugsbunny45 »

As my wait is about to end I was thinking if the state gave you-the option for quicker service would most people pay.
I think in my case I would have easily have given an extra 40.00 to speed my wait up.
From reading I know a lot of us pay extra to have delivery confirmation on our paper work.

How much would you have paid for quick service?
Member of NRA and TSRA
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#2

Post by jmra »

Sounds more like a bribe to me. "here's a little extra to put me ahead of the people who can already barely afford the cost of exercising their God given rights."

Doesn't sound right to me.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

i8godzilla
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1184
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Central TX
Contact:

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#3

Post by i8godzilla »

No, I would not pay more. On the other hand, I would like to see the employees that process the applications pay, based on meeting the states mandated 60 day time limit. I would also like to see the time limit reduced to less than 30.
No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor. -- Murdock v. Pennsylvania
If the State converts a right into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. -- Shuttleworth v. City of Birmingham
User avatar

XinTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:27 pm
Location: League City

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#4

Post by XinTX »

i8godzilla wrote:No, I would not pay more. On the other hand, I would like to see the employees that process the applications pay, based on meeting the states mandated 60 day time limit. I would also like to see the time limit reduced to less than 30.
+1 here. Given how much of our information is available to the state, give them 30 days unless there's an unresolved issue (like a prior arrest or something). But how many of us have already had a 'background check' for our jobs or something like that? I have. Had a full up FBI check. Fingerprints, the whole works. Wife went through b/g checks, finger prints, etc. for access to TDC units for some volunteer work she does. So I fail to see why you can get a D/L while you stand there, but to exercise a "right" takes two months to get a "permit" so we can exercise it. Even AFTER going through other background checks.
“Public safety is always the first cry of the tyrant.” - Lord Gladstone
User avatar

brandrum
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:31 pm

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#5

Post by brandrum »

I think that it's ridiculous that you have to wait up to six weeks just to receive a regular drivers license in Texas. When I lived in Missouri, you walked out with it in your hand.
User avatar

USA1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Tomball ,Texas
Contact:

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#6

Post by USA1 »

My theory is...If you want it sooner, you should have applied sooner.

I know that sounds mean and that's not my intention.
I'm just saying that there is an expected wait time and we should understand that there is a process.

I know how difficult it can be to wait. My CHL (as well as many others at the time) took over three months to process and I probably would've paid a little more to have that knocked down. However, when all is said and done, and you have that little piece of plastic in your hand, all your waiting worries melt away.

From what I've seen lately I think DPS is doing a good job with CHL processing.
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
User avatar

rescuetech
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:15 am

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#7

Post by rescuetech »

I wouldn't pay more (that's just me, I'M CHEAP and easy for any ladies on the board ;-) ).

I'm guessing those in the "waiting room" would generally say "yes, I'd pay to have the plastic right now" but those that have plastic in hand would lean to "it wasn't so bad, when looked at in the grand scheme of life"

just my 2 cents

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#8

Post by RPB »

Well, they didn't have this newfangled online filing when I got mine, but I put extra stamps on so the mailman would walk faster :mrgreen:
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

USA1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Tomball ,Texas
Contact:

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#9

Post by USA1 »

RPB wrote: I put extra stamps on so the mailman would walk faster :mrgreen:
"rlol"

I thought about putting a twenty dollar bill in my packet as an incentive but chickened out at the last minute. ;-)
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
User avatar

i8godzilla
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1184
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Central TX
Contact:

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#10

Post by i8godzilla »

USA1 wrote: "rlol"

I thought about putting a twenty dollar bill in my packet as an incentive but chickened out at the last minute. ;-)
You would more than likely would be charged with bribing a public official and never be able to get a CHL. :cryin
No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor. -- Murdock v. Pennsylvania
If the State converts a right into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. -- Shuttleworth v. City of Birmingham
User avatar

XinTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:27 pm
Location: League City

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#11

Post by XinTX »

i8godzilla wrote:
USA1 wrote: "rlol"

I thought about putting a twenty dollar bill in my packet as an incentive but chickened out at the last minute. ;-)
You would more than likely would be charged with bribing a public official and never be able to get a CHL. :cryin
And even if they did charge you, I bet they wouldn't give you your $20 back either.................
“Public safety is always the first cry of the tyrant.” - Lord Gladstone
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#12

Post by Oldgringo »

At the time, it seemed like it took forever and I was most anxious. In retrospect, My CHL is now some three years old and I haven't had to shoot anybody yet. So, what was the rush?

Nah, I paid plenty to start with. In fact, we Texans pay a lot more for our CHL than many other state residents pay for their respective CC licenses. :grumble :grumble
User avatar

XinTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:27 pm
Location: League City

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#13

Post by XinTX »

And if the state paper pushers had the option, they'd push EVERYONE (other than those who paid the 'expedited fee') to the back of the pile. So the only way you could get the CHL would be to pay the upper. And that would then become the new defacto cost for a CHL. They'd just delay the 'regular' folks forever, and claim justification because "these people paid to be put at the front of the line, so theirs get priority" and all the others would just gather cobwebs in an abandoned warehouse somewhere.
“Public safety is always the first cry of the tyrant.” - Lord Gladstone

KD5NRH
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3119
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Stephenville TX

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#14

Post by KD5NRH »

Oldgringo wrote:At the time, it seemed like it took forever and I was most anxious. In retrospect, My CHL is now some three years old and I haven't had to shoot anybody yet. So, what was the rush?
I haven't needed my seat belt in years, but I still hurry to put it on before I get out of the driveway.

KD5NRH
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3119
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Stephenville TX

Re: Would you have been willing to pay more for faster serv

#15

Post by KD5NRH »

XinTX wrote:But how many of us have already had a 'background check' for our jobs or something like that?
One for work, one for C&RFFL, one for ARES/RACES, and one for CHL. I'm just glad it's not like credit reports, where too many inquiries shows up as a negative, especially since my work one was redone in November, my FFL one is in progress, and my CHL renewal is due by June.
Post Reply

Return to “The "Waiting Room"”