Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


pedalman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:18 am
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
Contact:

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#286

Post by pedalman »

For newbies, this is the sign that is to be displayed when an establishment's TABC license has the line that says, "Sign = Blue".

Blue = :anamatedbanana

Red = :cryin
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 43
Posts: 18502
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#287

Post by Keith B »

Danny White wrote:I saw this sign at Lupe Tortilla Mexican Restaurant at I-10 and Beltway 6 near Katy. The way I read this sign, it just says if you don't have a license, you can't carry a concealed handgun, so obviously the sign means nothing for a licensed CHL holder right? I am assuming the restaurant gets almost all of their revenue from food.

Image
Welcome to the forum and you are correct. This type of sign is to be posted anywhere they sell alcohol for on or off premise consumption. It means nothing to a CHL as we are licensed and it says 'unlicensed' possession. :thumbs2:
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

Kevinf2349
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1090
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:14 pm
Location: League City, TX

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#288

Post by Kevinf2349 »

Dickinson PD are displaying an illegal 30.06 on their main doorway. It is white lettering stuck directly to the glass...not sure if they have the same sign in Spanish either as I wasn't really paying attention to it. I just noticed the english version.
Glock - When a FTF just isn't an option!

04/24/09 - CHL Class
08/17/09 - Plastic in hand!

NRA & TSRA Member

Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.

"Society doesn't have a gun problem; Society has a society problem"

wrinkles
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:09 pm

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#289

Post by wrinkles »

City of Apline Utility Department has a ghost busters sign in the front door. Says something like HandGuns prohibited by security company.

Rex B
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 25
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#290

Post by Rex B »

Rex B wrote:Good advice, and an angle I had not heard of.
I may want to tackle this for the Tarrant County Records Building, which has an obnoxious and strongly worded non-30.06 sign.
I was back there last week to get a car title changed. I noticed that obnoxious sign was gone, replaced by a generic "unlicensed persons" sign.
Next trip I'm going to ask the desk deputy about CHL carry.
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch

TxFig
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 12:29 pm
Location: Bryan, TX
Contact:

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#291

Post by TxFig »

Rex B wrote:
Rex B wrote:Good advice, and an angle I had not heard of.
I may want to tackle this for the Tarrant County Records Building, which has an obnoxious and strongly worded non-30.06 sign.
I was back there last week to get a car title changed. I noticed that obnoxious sign was gone, replaced by a generic "unlicensed persons" sign.
Next trip I'm going to ask the desk deputy about CHL carry.

I wouldn't - since it says "unlicensed", they are obviously not referring to folks WITH a license (ie. you).

Rex B
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 25
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#292

Post by Rex B »

TxFig wrote:
Rex B wrote:
Rex B wrote:Good advice, and an angle I had not heard of.
I may want to tackle this for the Tarrant County Records Building, which has an obnoxious and strongly worded non-30.06 sign.
I was back there last week to get a car title changed. I noticed that obnoxious sign was gone, replaced by a generic "unlicensed persons" sign.
Here's the new sign:Image
Next trip I'm going to ask the desk deputy about CHL carry.
I wouldn't - since it says "unlicensed", they are obviously not referring to folks WITH a license (ie. you).
I know, but I did. I rarely go there.
Of course the deputy on duty had his mind elsewhere and acted like I was invisible while he watched someone at the other end of the building.
I mentioned the sign change and asked if the building was now "CHL friendly".
He said "They just added knives and stuff to the sign. You have to be law enforcement to carry here"
I said "Why is that?"
"It's just like any other federal building, no firearms".
I said "But this is not a federal building, it's a county office building".
He said "they're all federal, doesn't matter" walking away.
Total idiot. I could see why he had that duty.
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch
User avatar

Liberty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#293

Post by Liberty »

I'm glad to see they are picking on 1911s, and leaving the Berettas alone.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 51
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#294

Post by seamusTX »

  • all guns
  • all knives
  • all chemical sprays
They left off key rings, fingernails, and teeth.

It's sad that someone gets paid to come up with stuff like this.

- Jim
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 33
Posts: 13562
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#295

Post by C-dub »

I'm sorry, but I've read this a few times and I'm just not seeing where it says anything about "unlicensed." I thought this was the obnoxious sign. Since it is not a proper sign I realize that it is referring to an unlicensed person. Is this what you meant?

Were there any metal detectors at the entrance?
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider

Rex B
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 25
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#296

Post by Rex B »

Yes, I know this is noncompliant. So was the old one.

The old sign was the obnoxious one. I sent a photo of that much earlier in this thread.
Here it is again:

Image
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch
User avatar

Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#297

Post by Purplehood »

Rex B wrote:Yes, I know this is noncompliant. So was the old one.

The old sign was the obnoxious one. I sent a photo of that much earlier in this thread.
Here it is again:

Image
Who do we bring these blatantly illegal signs to the attention of?
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 51
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#298

Post by seamusTX »

Only the entity (city council or whatever) that controls the property can take down these signs. You may be able to persuade them to do so, as I have mentioned previously in this thread. If you have deep pockets or a law degree, you may be able to get a court order that compels them to do so.

- Jim

Rex B
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 25
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#299

Post by Rex B »

Going back to the beginning:
The obnoxious post that says "this includes CHL holders" was posted during the term of a previous Tarrant county Sheriff.
Since then, Dee Anderson (Dem) has become sheriff, and the sign has changed.
I presume Sheriff Anderson is responsible for the sign change.
I intend to contact the sheriff and ask about it. Perhaps i'll write a letter and see if he will confirm (in writing) that CHLs are good to carry therein.
If he does, I might even vote for a Democrat next election.

I understand the "Don't ask, don't tell" concept, but walking into a government building is a bit different from going into a badly posted Taco Bueno.
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 43
Posts: 18502
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?

#300

Post by Keith B »

Purplehood wrote:
Rex B wrote:Yes, I know this is noncompliant. So was the old one.

The old sign was the obnoxious one. I sent a photo of that much earlier in this thread.
Here it is again:

Image
Who do we bring these blatantly illegal signs to the attention of?
The sign is not illegal, just invalid. They hold no legal weight. They can post whatever they want on the walls, we just don't have to abide by them as far as CHL is concerned. :thumbs2:
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”