If that is truly the case, it will be much easier to expose than if it's an overzealous agency and prosecutor.Captain Matt wrote: I bet the plan from the beginning was to steal his guns. I also bet this was not the first time they used threats and extortion to steal things.
In the department I worked in, evidence and property was so tightly controlled this could not happen without a large conspiracy between the arresting officer, his supervisor, and the property officer, at a minimum. Property and evidence were kept with a strict document trail, and after case disposition they had to be either returned to original owner, destroyed, or auctioned off by court order. Nothing was allowed to be taken by officers and law enforcement personnel were strictly banned from any resulting auctions. All weapons were always destroyed if not returned to original owners.
That was back in 1987-1995. I doubt there are many departments with less restrictive rules than that today.
I saw some mighty nice guns get ground into dime size pieces over the years.