Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 7:15 pm
- Location: DFW Area
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
I surely don't know, but what really blows my mind is that I remember at one point last year (?) the ATF stated that the hey would not be making rulings about braces any longer. But now I guess they're making rulings again? Assuming of course this is a result of the brace and not a judgment on some other portion of the weapon.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Nevermind...
All lost in a tragic kayaking incident.
Bring back BitterClinger
Nevermind...
All lost in a tragic kayaking incident.
Bring back BitterClinger
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 1:51 pm
- Location: DFW (Denton County)
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
I'm guessing this has to do with the brace itself. Looking at the picture, it seems the brace is probably creating a "length of pull" (distance between middle of trigger and end of brace) of more than 13.5 inches fully extended. That ATF has already issued a letter in the past stating that a LOP of over 13.5 inches would redesign the brace to be a shoulder stock. If that's the case, then shortening the brace on a honey badger will bandaid the problem. To fix the real problem, we need to have the ATF stop legislating from their back office and repeal the NFA.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
- Location: Vernon, Texas
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 7:15 pm
- Location: DFW Area
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
Perhaps, but while I was researching this, a user on a different forum stated that his fully extended was 12.5" (the Honey Badger).strogg wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 8:02 am I'm guessing this has to do with the brace itself. Looking at the picture, it seems the brace is probably creating a "length of pull" (distance between middle of trigger and end of brace) of more than 13.5 inches fully extended. That ATF has already issued a letter in the past stating that a LOP of over 13.5 inches would redesign the brace to be a shoulder stock. If that's the case, then shortening the brace on a honey badger will bandaid the problem. To fix the real problem, we need to have the ATF stop legislating from their back office and repeal the NFA.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Nevermind...
All lost in a tragic kayaking incident.
Bring back BitterClinger
Nevermind...
All lost in a tragic kayaking incident.
Bring back BitterClinger
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 4339
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
This is precisely what happened with the redefining of bump stocks as "machine guns". Previously approved by the ATF, then made illegal. No compensation to owners, and (using the ATF's definition) the largest gun confiscation in U.S. history. SCOTUS effectively endorsed this confiscation by refusing to hear the case.crazy2medic wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 7:21 am How do they square the fact they approved the arm braces, then after thousands are in circulation to suddenly ban them? I Know it's the GOVT but they makes 0 sense!
Does the term arbitrary and Capricious come to mind?
I've long held that our rights mentioned in 2nd Amendment need the same level of protection as other rights that are mentioned in the Constitution. The easiest example is the right to vote. Can you imagine what would happen if Trump ordered an Executive agency to arbitrarily rescind the right to vote of 300,000+ citizens. I'd imagine that SCOTUS would, at a minimum, want to hear that case.
Note I say "mentioned" because these rights WERE NOT granted by government in any way. Rather, these are rights that we chose to retain for ourselves when we decided to form the government that we currently have.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1158
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:10 pm
- Location: far n fortworh
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
But an ar15 doesn't meet the definition of a firearm as listed by atf, so sense it's not going on a "firearm" why is the atf involved?
AR-15 lower receiver does not house the bolt or breechblock and is not threaded to the barrel, as defined in 27 C.F.R. § 478.11, it does not constitute a “receiver” and cannot be considered a “firearm” under federal law.
AR-15 lower receiver does not house the bolt or breechblock and is not threaded to the barrel, as defined in 27 C.F.R. § 478.11, it does not constitute a “receiver” and cannot be considered a “firearm” under federal law.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 6745
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
- Location: Hunt County
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:41 pm
- Location: Central Texas
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
I think there was a case thrown out or sent to the appeals court in California arguing that very point.cheezit wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 5:43 pm But an ar15 doesn't meet the definition of a firearm as listed by atf, so sense it's not going on a "firearm" why is the atf involved?
AR-15 lower receiver does not house the bolt or breechblock and is not threaded to the barrel, as defined in 27 C.F.R. § 478.11, it does not constitute a “receiver” and cannot be considered a “firearm” under federal law.
In certain extreme situations, the law is inadequate. In order to shame its inadequacy, it is necessary to act outside the law to pursue a natural justice.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:18 am
- Location: Arlington
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
From the article:
I agree with many of Ronald Turk's options to reduce or modify firearms regulations. As the COO of the ATF, he very much knew what he was talking about. Time to start implementing his ideas.
Not notifying the public should make those rules un-enforceable.Worse than simply creating new rules is the fact that they often exist solely in agency-internal memos. The public isn’t notified of the rules (let alone given a public comment period, such as what happened with the proposed M855 ammo ban), yet the agency attempts to actively enforce them on otherwise law-abiding folk with no intention or knowledge of breaking the law.
I agree with many of Ronald Turk's options to reduce or modify firearms regulations. As the COO of the ATF, he very much knew what he was talking about. Time to start implementing his ideas.
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 698
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:00 pm
- Location: DFW, Texas
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
The people in the ATF under Trump are the exact same people that were in the ATF under Obama. Idiotic bump stock ban that everyone likes to point to notwithstanding, the Trump presidency has not damaged gun rights. It also has not expanded them, unfortunately, but if you really expected it to, then you may be a little naive. We have fared much better under Trump than we would have under Hillary. We will fare much better under Trump than under Biden, God willing.Grayling813 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 08, 2020 7:28 amSure, because the current (red) administration is the one pushing more incremental infringements.
I prefer dangerous freedom to safety in chains.
Let's go Brandon.
Let's go Brandon.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:18 am
- Location: Arlington
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
No disputing we’re better off with Trump than Clinton or Biden.LucasMcCain wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 9:16 amThe people in the ATF under Trump are the exact same people that were in the ATF under Obama. Idiotic bump stock ban that everyone likes to point to notwithstanding, the Trump presidency has not damaged gun rights. It also has not expanded them, unfortunately, but if you really expected it to, then you may be a little naive. We have fared much better under Trump than we would have under Hillary. We will fare much better under Trump than under Biden, God willing.Grayling813 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 08, 2020 7:28 amSure, because the current (red) administration is the one pushing more incremental infringements.
However Trump has endorsed red flag laws, and his administration allowed the ATF to reclassify bump stocks after the still mysterious Las Vegas shooting.
Saying it’s the same people at ATF under Trump as Obama is another indication of his not fulfilling the promise of draining the swamp.
That being said, I fully support and will vote for Trump again.
I’m not naive enough to believe anyone in government cares about me beyond whether or not I continue to pay my taxes.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
I understand that the Q,LLC owner is rightfully upset. However, he has grossly overstated the impact of the cease and desist letter set to Q. It did not make 4 million American felons. The letter applies only to pistols manufactured and sold by Q. It does not apply to all pistol braces manufactured by SB Tactical. I'm rather surprised that Colion seemed to accept this bogus claim, but perhaps he didn't want to contradict his guest.
This isn't to say that the BATFE won't go after other AR pistols with SB Tactical braces. They might do just that.
Chas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2018 7:15 pm
- Location: DFW Area
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
I think this was the implication of what was said. But if that was the case I really wish people would explicitly say what they mean and mean what they say instead of treading in that muddy area that's often left open to speculation.Charles L. Cotton wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 7:06 pmI understand that the Q,LLC owner is rightfully upset. However, he has grossly overstated the impact of the cease and desist letter set to Q. It did not make 4 million American felons. The letter applies only to pistols manufactured and sold by Q. It does not apply to all pistol braces manufactured by SB Tactical. I'm rather surprised that Colion seemed to accept this bogus claim, but perhaps he didn't want to contradict his guest.
This isn't to say that the BATFE won't go after other AR pistols with SB Tactical braces. They might do just that.
Chas.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Nevermind...
All lost in a tragic kayaking incident.
Bring back BitterClinger
Nevermind...
All lost in a tragic kayaking incident.
Bring back BitterClinger
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:41 pm
- Location: Central Texas
Re: Rep. Gaetz Calls on ATF to Cease Plans Restricting Arm Brace Usage
Being made up by unelected government officials should make them un-enforceable.Paladin wrote: ↑Thu Oct 08, 2020 8:14 am
Not notifying the public should make those rules un-enforceable.
Not to mention the fact these rules violate the 2nd Amendment as does the laws theses devices are trying to get around.
In certain extreme situations, the law is inadequate. In order to shame its inadequacy, it is necessary to act outside the law to pursue a natural justice.