Andy C and TAM - Update Please on Form 1 Suppressor Build

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
troglodyte
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:16 pm
Location: Hockley County
Contact:

Andy C and TAM - Update Please on Form 1 Suppressor Build

#1

Post by troglodyte »

Gentlemen,

It has been almost 5 years since you built your suppressor. Would you give us an update on how the suppressors you built are holding up?

I'm getting back around to wanting to build my own. The price is a large contributing factor but I would like to know how they are holding up for you long term.

viewtopic.php?f=87&t=80252&hilit=suppressor+andy+c
Talon Firearms Training
Instructor - License To Carry, School Safety, First Responder: Texas DPS, Certified Instructor: Rangemasters/Tom Givens
NRA Instructor - Basic Pistol, Personal Protection in the Home, Personal Protection Outside the Home, Range Safety Officer
Stop The Bleed Instructor
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26851
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: And C and TAM - Update Please on Form 1 Suppressor Build

#2

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Mine worked great until a while back, when a baffle strike cause the bullet to impact the edge of the exit hole, chipping a chunk out of the inner aspect of the end cap. I bought a replacement endcap, but it requires some additional milling to remove excess material. Otherwise the exit hole would be about 1” long from front to back. I can still shoot the thing with the original endcap, and it still suppresses, but with it being damaged, it’s not very accurate right now.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26851
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: And C and TAM - Update Please on Form 1 Suppressor Build

#3

Post by The Annoyed Man »

The Annoyed Man wrote: Wed Jun 24, 2020 9:50 pm Mine worked great until a while back, when a baffle strike cause the bullet to impact the edge of the exit hole, chipping a chunk out of the inner aspect of the end cap. I bought a replacement endcap, but it requires some additional milling to remove excess material. Otherwise the exit hole would be about 1” long from front to back. I can still shoot the thing with the original endcap, and it still suppresses, but with it being damaged, it’s not very accurate right now.
I need to add the following so nobody misconstrues what I posted above.....

When filing a form 1 for a suppressor, you are a "maker". That entitles you to "make" exactly one suppressor. You cannot "repair" a suppressor you’ve built without having a Type 7 FFL with a Type 3 SOT. I do not.

That is why I have NOT proceeded with milling and drilling the end cap I bought. Right now, it’s just an end cap for a solvent trap....or something. It’s just an interesting piece of machined titanium. But it’s NOT a suppressor part. That would be illegal. At the time that I bought it, I wasn’t aware that it would be illegal for me to finish it out and install it. Fortunately, I found out BEFORE I turned it into a suppressor part, and it remains today as I purchased it.

In other words, the can that I built on the form 1 has been basically ruined. It will shoot, and it will still suppress, but it won’t shoot accurately. So, it sits in my safe, awaiting the day when either the NFA is repealed, or the fedgov’t is no longer relevant and no longer has the power to enforce its unjust laws.

In the meantime, I am planning to file another form 1 when I have some money set aside, and I will use that solvent trap end cap in that future build. As it happens, I also own a commercial form 4 .30 cal rifle suppressor (AAC 762-SDN-6), and I’m using it for all of my rifle suppression needs instead.

FYI, I have a theory as to why I experienced the strike that ruined the can. I made mine pretty long. End caps included, it’s 10”, and it has 15 of the freeze plug baffles in it. In retrospect, I think that both the length and the number of baffles are probably excessive. My son's form 1 can, using the same design with the same materials, but only 7” long with fewer baffles, continues to work just fine, and it doesn’t seem to suppress noise any less than my loner can, with it’s bigger baffle count. The two rifles I was using mine on were an 18” heavy barreled DMR/SPR type of AR, and my 16” barreled SCAR 17S. On the AR, it worked just fine. But on the SCAR 17, it would occasionally shoot loose .... both from the rifle, and within itself. The SCAR has a MIGHTY muzzle blast. Also, while the SCAR is extremely accurate for a "battle rifle", it has what amounts to a pencil barrel. It’s possible I suppose that the weight of my overly long and "over-baffled" can hanging out there on the end of that pencil barrel increased the amount of barrel whip enough to destabilize the bullet as it exited the muzzle. I don’t know, but it’s just a thought. I have since found out that, in addition to the SCAR's propensity for beating up scopes, it’s bolt carrier can be catastrophically damaged by too much firing when suppressed....even with the gas block set to the suppressor setting. The video I saw was pretty ugly, and that has to be an expensive part. So for now, I’m going to put an AAC combination muzzle brake / flash hider on it, and just occasionally shoot it with my AAC can.

As far as using freeze plugs for baffles goes, they work, but I don’t think they’re the best alternative. Their main advantage is that they are cheap and easily available. I think that their primary flaw is that, even once formed, they are still too short from front to back; and so if you stack them without alternating spacers, they’re too close together to be as effective as they could be. On my next build, I’ll probably buy kit parts.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

flechero
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3486
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: And C and TAM - Update Please on Form 1 Suppressor Build

#4

Post by flechero »

The Annoyed Man wrote: Thu Jun 25, 2020 8:10 am
When filing a form 1 for a suppressor, you are a "maker". That entitles you to "make" exactly one suppressor. You cannot "repair" a suppressor you’ve built without having a Type 7 FFL with a Type 3 SOT. I do not.

That is why I have NOT proceeded with milling and drilling the end cap I bought.
Tam,

I'm not sure what a type 7/3 paper does but how would repairing or replacing a part on a serialized item be an issue? You aren't making a 2nd suppressor, just repairing a single component or part. I don't see how that's any different than replacing a (insert non-serialized part here) on any other gun. Do you need those to repair or replace a part on a SBR?

Rethinking the hassle of trust and stamps.....

thanks!

strogg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 1:51 pm
Location: DFW (Denton County)

Re: And C and TAM - Update Please on Form 1 Suppressor Build

#5

Post by strogg »

The Annoyed Man wrote: Wed Jun 24, 2020 9:50 pm Mine worked great until a while back, when a baffle strike cause the bullet to impact the edge of the exit hole, chipping a chunk out of the inner aspect of the end cap. I bought a replacement endcap, but it requires some additional milling to remove excess material. Otherwise the exit hole would be about 1” long from front to back. I can still shoot the thing with the original endcap, and it still suppresses, but with it being damaged, it’s not very accurate right now.
For my Form 1 suppressor, I used a 1/2x28 threaded end cap as the exit when I first built it. It's a bit big for an exit hole, but this way, I know the hole is centered, because a CNC mill in a factory is far more accurate than my cheap drill press. Just a thought. Also, it helps my can is a .45 can, so the exit hole isn't really all that much bigger than it should be.
User avatar

Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6576
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Andy C and TAM - Update Please on Form 1 Suppressor Build

#6

Post by Paladin »

Is there a limit to how many Form 1 Suppressors can be built? If I have 2 different calibers, would I need to give it some time after the first build is approved to apply for a second build?
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
User avatar

Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6576
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Andy C and TAM - Update Please on Form 1 Suppressor Build

#7

Post by Paladin »

AndyC wrote: Fri Jun 26, 2020 1:55 pm No; as many as you can afford to apply for.
Thanks!
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
User avatar

Syntyr
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1662
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:54 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Andy C and TAM - Update Please on Form 1 Suppressor Build

#8

Post by Syntyr »

Thanks Gents for all of the info. I too have been following these discussions. I have been looking into a modular solvent trap.

https://www.silencershop.com/jk-155p-mst-kit.html

Also - https://medliningmachineworks.com/ and Quiet Bore as posted up page.

Image
Syntyr
"Wherever you go... There you are." - Buckaroo Banzai
"Inconceivable!" - Fizzinni
User avatar

johncanfield
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 9:04 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Re: Andy C and TAM - Update Please on Form 1 Suppressor Build

#9

Post by johncanfield »

I have three Form 1s, built two and I haven't machined my 5.56mm can yet (but in the planning phase.) My aluminum .22 suppressor works fantastically well but it took quite a bit of machining, K baffles with a port (I have a Griz gunsmith lathe and a small mill). Second can is .30 caliber in stainless steel, plain cones - about eight of them with spacers. I mainly use it on my 300 Blackout, in fact I haven't used it on my .308 AR :???: . With 200 grain 300 Blackout I can shoot with no hearing protection - it's just a loud click. It's heavy even though I reduced the thickness of the tube away from the blast chamber.

Buying a commercial can would be the way to go unless you like a project and a challenge of which I was fully committed.
LC9s, M&P 22, 9c, Sig P238-P239-P226-P365XL, 1911 clone

strogg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 1:51 pm
Location: DFW (Denton County)

Re: Andy C and TAM - Update Please on Form 1 Suppressor Build

#10

Post by strogg »

Thanks for the kit links, gents. My next Form 1s will definitely be in a kit form. Freeze plugs, while convenient, aren't the best for silencers. Stainless steel is pretty decent, but not when it's cheaply made and stamp formed. You're better off with milled steel.

As someone who loves DIY projects and already has all the tools necessary, I am a fan of going Form 1. But for those who don't have the tools or those who want something that works right out of the box, then off-the-shelf suppressors will be the way to go. Form 4 jail isn't all that bad, especially if you purchase from an FFL who will let you use the suppressor at the range during jail time. For example, if you buy it at a shooting range, they will let you borrow the suppressor for shooting inside the facility. You just can't take it home until the tax stamp is in your hand.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”