Would you "open carry"?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 12329
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Angelina County
On occassion I sure would.
I like both options.
I like both options.
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
There are many states where open carry is legal, and not uncommon to see, but there is a notable absence of carriers being "shot first" or mugged for their guns.ELB wrote:Like the others, to me open carry says "shoot me first,' or "mug me for my gun."
I would definitely open carry in some situations, including much of my everyday life, but there are other situations where I would conceal.
Kevin
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 34
- Posts: 4962
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:40 pm
- Location: Deep East Texas
Re: Would you "open carry"?
carlson1 wrote:Dan The Man I would not always open carry, but I would at times. I open carried a little over 14 years on duty and off duty and had ZERO problems. This has been discussed here many times it is no doubtphddan wrote:Stringer wrote:IF you could carry openly in Texas, would you? Do you think that's safer than carrying concealed?
I absolutely, unequivocally, without a doubt, most assuredly would carry openly.
There is no proof one way or the other whether it's safer or not.
Dan
+1
I can think of times when it would be convenient to carry openly.
Spartans ask not how many, but where!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:27 am
- Location: Plano
- Contact:
Re: Would you "open carry"?
Same here.carlson1 wrote: I would not always open carry, but I would at times.
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 46
- Posts: 2173
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:24 pm
- Location: Smithville, TX
I've visited quite a few states, including AZ, NM, NH, VT, and VA, and I have yet to be anywhere where open carry was "not uncommon to see". I have found open carry to be very rare. This goes double in urban areas.KBCraig wrote: There are many states where open carry is legal, and not uncommon to see, but there is a notable absence of carriers being "shot first" or mugged for their guns.
Which states are you talking about, where open carry is not uncommon?
Ahm jus' a Southern boy trapped in a Yankee's body
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:47 pm
- Location: Austin
I worked full-time in a mom/pop style gun shop/sporting outfitter during my freshman and sophomore year of college ('05-'06). While 9 out of the 12 total employees carried concealed, no one--not even the owner--carried openly. My boss explained to me his rules on CC as I was still there when I first got my CHL, stating that while he liked the idea, he would not allow open carry as it could deter some customers. He liked to say that he'd rather keep that one extra customer (who might leave due to discomfort around OC) than avoid the extra step of concealing.
Nemo me impune lacessit.
-
- Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:10 am
- Location: Fort Worth
I would carry openly.
I've heard the argument over and over again about becoming a target if open carrying but I still question this theory. It would seem to me that if a BG walked in a bank and saw a LEO, they would be deterred from proceeding further (assuming said BG isn't a crackhead). I think carrying open would be similar but not the same.
My CHL instructor emphasized that bad guys dislike two things:
1. Getting caught
2. Getting hurt
I'd say that open carry may indicate to a BG a large possibility that #2 may become a reality should they act like a fool. (again, assuming they are not a crackhead)
I've heard the argument over and over again about becoming a target if open carrying but I still question this theory. It would seem to me that if a BG walked in a bank and saw a LEO, they would be deterred from proceeding further (assuming said BG isn't a crackhead). I think carrying open would be similar but not the same.
My CHL instructor emphasized that bad guys dislike two things:
1. Getting caught
2. Getting hurt
I'd say that open carry may indicate to a BG a large possibility that #2 may become a reality should they act like a fool. (again, assuming they are not a crackhead)
Sig P239 .40
S&W Model 60 .357
S&W Model 60 .357
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 46
- Posts: 2173
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:24 pm
- Location: Smithville, TX
How about the argument that the gun could get snatched by someone when you find yourself in close quarters with a lot of other people around?L8RG8R wrote:I would carry openly.
I've heard the argument over and over again about becoming a target if open carrying but I still question this theory.
It (being in close quarters) happens sometimes when you are in public.
Would you be using a rentention type holster as many LEO do?
IMO, carrying concealed preserves the element of surprise, which is a huge tactical advantage. Knowledge is power. If I'm carrying concealed, I have some very valuable knowledge that a potential assailant doesn't have.
Ahm jus' a Southern boy trapped in a Yankee's body
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
- Location: Galveston
- Contact:
While my initial reaction is to say "No, I won't open carry" However I might prefer at times to carry my full sized Ruger in the Open if I were hiking or something. On a Long drive I might unholster for a while and set the handgun on the passanger seat. instead of the console.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
-
- Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:10 am
- Location: Fort Worth
I think using a retention holster would be a fine idea. Yes, sometimes quarters do get close in public. I guess I envision myself putting my arm down against the weapon in those situations and trying to move to a more open space. I don't care much for shoulder to shoulder standing room only and usually try to avoid those situations anyway. You won't catch me at a mall in the months of November or December.frankie_the_yankee wrote:How about the argument that the gun could get snatched by someone when you find yourself in close quarters with a lot of other people around?L8RG8R wrote:I would carry openly.
I've heard the argument over and over again about becoming a target if open carrying but I still question this theory.
It (being in close quarters) happens sometimes when you are in public.
Would you be using a retention type holster as many LEO do?
Sig P239 .40
S&W Model 60 .357
S&W Model 60 .357
As someone who came from a state (Missouri) where open carry is not illegal (anomalous), you need to be semi discreet about it. The big advantage is you can strap on your hip if you head to the range without repercussion of it not being concealed. You can leave it openly displayed on the car seat, etc.
However, you really don't want to go on your daily shopping trips to the stores as it can still be considered 'brandishing or displaying in a threatening manner'. It is just not proper etiquette to do the ‘Wally-World Stroll’ with a S&W 500 hanging on your hip. It draws a lot of attention and makes too many non-gunners uneasy. There can also be local ordinances that prohibit it, as well as you being looked down upon by the store folks for running off their customers.
While I am for open carry being legal, you need to use it sparingly and not blatantly wander through the public realm carrying openly.
So to answer the question, I would if I was not exposed to a lot of non-gunners or big crowds.
However, you really don't want to go on your daily shopping trips to the stores as it can still be considered 'brandishing or displaying in a threatening manner'. It is just not proper etiquette to do the ‘Wally-World Stroll’ with a S&W 500 hanging on your hip. It draws a lot of attention and makes too many non-gunners uneasy. There can also be local ordinances that prohibit it, as well as you being looked down upon by the store folks for running off their customers.
While I am for open carry being legal, you need to use it sparingly and not blatantly wander through the public realm carrying openly.
So to answer the question, I would if I was not exposed to a lot of non-gunners or big crowds.
Last edited by Keith B on Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4